期刊文献+

新产程标准管理对高龄初产妇妊娠结局的影响 被引量:1

The effect of New standard of deliveryon pregnancy outcome of early pregnant women
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨新产程标准管理对高龄初产妇妊娠结局的影响,分析该标准管理高龄初产妇的可行性。方法:以连续入组的方式收集2015年1月至2016年12月足月分娩的150例高龄产妇,按照数字列表法分为研究组与对照组,各75例,其中对照组采用"Friedman产程标准"管理,研究组采用《新产程标准及处理的专家共识(2014)》进行管理,比较两组患者剖宫产率、人工干预率及母婴妊娠结局。结果:1)研究组剖宫产分娩率为22.67%(17例),对照组为38.67%(29例),两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ~2=4.515,P<0.05);2)研究组人工破膜、会阴侧切术、低位产钳术低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(χ~2=2.516、1.758、0.118,P>0.05),研究组催产素使用率显著低于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(χ~2=3.803,P<0.05);3)研究组产妇、新生儿分娩相关发生率为8.00%,对照组为2.67%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(Fisher=2.113,P>0.05);4)两组新生儿均为活产,1min与5min Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(t=1.475、1.536,P>0.05)。结论:新产程标准有助于降低高龄初产妇剖宫产率,且具有较高的安全性。 Objective:To explore the effect of new standard management on the outcome of early pregnancy in pregnant women, and to analyze the feasibility of the standard management of primiparous women Method:Take a continuous approach to collect full-time delivery of 150 cases of elderly mothers from January 2015-December 2016. According to the digital list method is di-vided into study group and control group of 75 cases^the control group was managed by ^Friedman Labor Standard5%The study group used the 4〈new labor standards and treatment of expert consensus (2014)^10 manage, the rate of cesarean section, artifi-cial intervention rate and maternal pregnancy outcome were compared between the two groups. Result: 1 )T h e rate of cesarean delivery was 22. 67% (17) in the study group and 38. 67% (29) in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =4. 515, P 〈 0. 05). 2)The study group of artificial rupture of membranes,perineal incision,lower clamp forceps lower than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant(χ2 = 2. 516〉1. 758〉0. HSyP 0. 05) ^The rate of ox-ytocin in the study group was significantly lower than that in the control group the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 3. 803, P 〈 0. 05). 3)The incidence of maternal and neonatal births was 6% in the study group and 2. 7% in the control group,respectively. There was no significant difference (Fisher =2. 113, P〉0. 05). 4) Two groups of newborns are live birthslmin and 5min Apgar scores was no significant difference between two groups (t=1. 475,1. 536,P 〉 0. 05). Conclu-sion: The new standard of labor can help to reduce the rate of cesarean section in the elderly, and it has high safety.
作者 周晓丽 刘志强 Zhou Xiaoli;Liu Zhiqiang(Binzhou Medical College, Binzhou, Shandong 25660)
出处 《中外女性健康研究》 2018年第2期19-20,30,共3页 Women's Health Research
关键词 新产程标准 高龄 初产妇 任娠结局 New production standard Old age Primipara Pregnancy outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献80

  • 1汪萍,苏悦,周学勤.妊娠期妇女对分娩方式选择的调查分析[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2006,14(5):80-81. 被引量:9
  • 2钟利若,折瑞莲,张立军.第二产程时限与新生儿结局的关系[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2007,6(1):56-56. 被引量:13
  • 3谷祖善 赵霞.应不应该做会阴切开.实用妇产科杂志,1993,:275-275. 被引量:8
  • 4谢幸,苟文丽.妇产科学[M].8版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2013:118-119. 被引量:1253
  • 5Friedman EA.Primigravid labor:a graphicostatistical analysis [J].Obstet Gynecol,1955,6:567-589. 被引量:1
  • 6Zhang J,Landy H J,Branch DW,et al.Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes[J].Obstet Gynecol,2010,116:1281-1287. 被引量:1
  • 7Spong CY,Berghella V,Wenstrom KD,et al.Preventing the first cesarean delivery:summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development,Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine,and American College of Obstetricians andGynecologists Workshop [J].Obstet Gynecol,2012,120:1181-1193. 被引量:1
  • 8Walker R, Turnbu11 D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence[J]. Birth, 2002,29:28-39. 被引量:1
  • 9Betrdn AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, et al. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates[l]. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 2007,21:98-113. 被引量:1
  • 10C6ceres IA, Arcaya M, Declercq E, et al. Hospital differences in cesarean deliveries in Massachusetts (US)2004-2006: the case against case-mix artifact [J]. PLoS One, 2013,8:e57817. 被引量:1

共引文献912

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部