摘要
目的分析树脂、金属、陶瓷在糖尿病患者口腔修复中的抗摩擦性对比。方法随机选择该院2015年5月—2016年5月收治的糖尿病患者进行口腔修复的126例(183颗牙齿)作为分析对象,根据患者选择的修复材料的不同,分成:树脂组、金属组、陶瓷组3组,每组42例(61颗牙齿)患者;之后分析3组患者牙齿修复成功率和失败因素。结果 3组患者在6个月内、2年内牙齿修复成功率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);6个月内树脂组、金属组、陶瓷组成功率分别是:95.08%、95.08%、91.80%;2年内修复成功率分别表现为:91.80%、90.16%、90.16%。失败原因主要有牙齿出现松动、破裂、畸形等情况。结论对糖尿病患者分别选择树脂、金属、陶瓷等材料进行口腔修复,抗摩擦效果基本一致,临床使用可以根据患者的需求进行选择。
Objective To analyze the comparison of anti-frictional behavior of Resins, metals and ceramics in the oral rehabilitation of diabetes patients. Methods 126 cases(183 teeth) of diabetes patients for oral rehabilitation admitted and treated in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2016 were selected as the research objects and divided into three groups according to the repair materials, including the resin group, mental group and ceramic group, with 42 cases( 61 teeth) in each, and the teeth rehabilitation successful rate and failure factor were analyzed. Results There were no obvious differences in the teeth repair successful rate in 6 months and 2 year between the three group(P>0.05), in 6 months, the successful rate in the resin group, mental group and ceramic group and in 2 year were respectively 95.08%, 95.08%, 91.80% and 91.80%, 90.16%,90.16%, and the main failure causes were loosening, rupture and deformity. Conclusion The resin, metal and ceramic for oral rehabilitation of diabetes patients can obtain the similar anti-frictional effect, and we can select them according to the patients' demands.
出处
《糖尿病新世界》
2017年第17期29-30,共2页
Diabetes New World Magazine
关键词
口腔修复
糖尿病
抗摩擦性
不同材料
Oral rehabilitation
Diabetes
Anti-frictional behavior
Different materials
