摘要
目的:比较采取不同静脉通路方式输注榄香烯注射液治疗时所引起静脉炎与疼痛的情况。方法:观察并比较采用PICC导管通路和留置针通路输注榄香烯注射液治疗肿瘤时,患者输液后静脉反应情况。结果:PICC导管通路组肿瘤患者输液后静脉炎发生率及刺痛感小于留置针通路组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:榄香烯注射液在临床输注治疗过程中,更适宜选用PICC导管通路,不仅能明显减轻患者的刺痛感,而且能有效减少静脉炎的发生。
Objective：To observe the phlebitis and pain associated with elemene infusion via different venous access.Methods：Intusion of elemene was carried out in cancer patients by either peripherally inserted central catheter access（PICC） or detained needle access,and the incidences of phlebitis and pain were compared between the two accesses.Results ：Patient undergone PICC infusion of elemene had lower incidences of phlebitis and pain than those received detained needle access.The difference was significant（P〈0.01 ）.Conclusion：intravenous infusion of elemene by PICC access may effectively reduce the incidences of phlebitis and pain.
出处
《皖南医学院学报》
CAS
2018年第1期94-96,共3页
Journal of Wannan Medical College
