期刊文献+

高分辨靶重建模式优化宝石CT成像 被引量:4

High resolution reconstruction for optimization of imaging quality of GE Discovery CT 750 HD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的以体模实验为基础,观察高分辨靶重建模式优化宝石CT成像的价值。方法采用宝石CT不同的扫描野(SFOV;50cm vs 32cm)对Catphan 500体模分别进行高分辨和非高分辨模式扫描,并对原始数据以相同大小的显示野(25cm)进行STAND算法重建成像。根据不同成像方式,将所有图像分为SFOV 50cm+非高分辨组(A组)、SFOV50cm+高分辨组(B组)、SFOV 32cm+非高分辨组(C组)和SFOV 32cm+高分辨组(D组),测量并比较各组图像噪声、SNR、CNR、空间分辨率、密度分辨率及CT剂量指数(CTDI)。结果 4组噪声、SNR、CNR、空间分辨率、密度分辨率及CTDI差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。C组较A组噪声增加(P<0.01);与A组比较,B组空间分辨率提高,D组CNR、SNR均降低(P均<0.01),且噪声升高(P<0.01)。结论选择高分辨靶重建模式,不增加图像噪声,并可保证对比噪声比和信噪比,提高空间分辨率。 Objective To explore the value of high resolution reconstruction for optimization of imaging quality of GE Discovery CT 750 HD based on phantom pilot.Methods CT scanning with large (50 cm) and small (32 cm) scanning field of view (SFOV) was performed for a Catphan 500 phantom with or without high resolution on GE Discovery CT 750 HD. All raw data acquired by volumetric CT scan were reconstructed as the same size of a small DFOV (25 cm) with STAND algorithm. Then the images were divided into four groups, including large SFOV without high resolution (group A), large SFOV with high resolution (group B), small SFOV without high resolution (group C) and small SFOV with high resolution (group D). The spatial-resolution (SR), density-resolution (DR), noise (N), CNR, SNR and CT dose index volumes (CTDI) were measured and compared among 4 groups.Results The overall differences of SR, DR, N, CNR, SNR and CTDI were statistically significant among four groups (all P〈0.05). Compared with group A, the average N increased in group C (P〈0.01), SR increased in group B and the average CNR and SNR decreased in group D, while N increased in group D (all P〈0.01).Conclusion Large SFOV combined with high resolution reconstruction may ensure CNR and SNR, and improve SR.
出处 《中国介入影像与治疗学》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第2期104-107,共4页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy
基金 北京市自然科学基金(7172049)
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 体模 显像术 高分辨 Tomography, X-ray eomputed Phantoms, imaging High resolution
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献29

  • 1王振光,马大庆,陈步东,贺文,王新莲,刘大亮.容积数据高分辨率CT重组在弥漫性肺疾病中的应用[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(11):1153-1156. 被引量:27
  • 2白玫,彭明辰.X线CT成像质量评估中的调制传递函数的测试与分析[J].医疗设备信息,2006,21(5):11-13. 被引量:15
  • 3Funama Y,Awai K, Nakayama Y,et al. Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: phantom study. Radiology,2005,237:905-910. 被引量:1
  • 4Kalra MK, Maher MM, Kamath RS,et al. Sixteen-detector row CT of abdomen and pelvis: a study for optimization of Z-axis modulation technique perfm'med in 153 patients. Radiology ,2004, 233:241-249. 被引量:1
  • 5Siegel MJ, Schmidt B, Bradley D, et al. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape. Radiology,2004,233:515-522. 被引量:1
  • 6Kalra MK, Maher MM, Prasad SR, et al. Correlation of patient weight and cross-sectional dimensions with subjective image quality at standard dose abdominal CT. Korean J Radio ,2003,4: 234-238. 被引量:1
  • 7Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funzma Y, et al. Abdominal CT with low tube vohage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise. Radiology, 2005,237 : 945-951. 被引量:1
  • 8Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H, et al. Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of the different concentrations of contrast material at muhi-detector row helical CT. Radiology,2002,224:754-763. 被引量:1
  • 9Brisse HJ, Brenot J, PielTat N, et al. The relevance of image quality indices for dose optimization in abdominal multi-detector row CT in children: experimental assessment with pediatric phantoms. Phys Med Biol,2009,54 : 1871-1892. 被引量:1
  • 10Nyman U, Ahl TL, Kristiansson M, et al. Patient-circumference- adapted dose regulation in body computed tomography: a practical and flexible formula. Aeta Radio| ,2005,46:396-406. 被引量:1

共引文献84

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部