摘要
目的对慢阻肺伴呼吸衰竭患者在接受雾化吸入治疗的基础上行综合护理的临床效果进行研究及判定。方法选取本院2016年2月—2017年1月收治的60例慢阻肺伴呼吸衰竭患者依据信封式随机分组的方式分为对照组、观察组,各30例,均行雾化吸入治疗,对照组在雾化吸入治疗的基础上予以常规护理,观察组在雾化吸入治疗的基础上行综合护理,并对比其效果。结果观察组患者经治疗、护理干预后总好转率高于对照组(P<0.05),焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分分别为(39.79±9.13)分、(42.44±9.52)分,且生活质量情况均较对照组具有显著优势(P<0.05),同时,观察组患者经治疗、护理干预的护理满意度为100.00%,显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论对慢阻肺伴呼吸衰竭患者在接受雾化吸入治疗的基础上行综合护理的临床效果显著。
Objective To study and determine the clinical effect of patients with chronic lung disease with respiratory failure on the basis of integrated nursing of atomized inhalation therapy. Methods In our hospital from February 2016 to January 2017, 60 cases of COPD patients with respiratory failure with randomized way on the basis of the envelope type were divided into control group and observation group, 30 cases in each group, all of them were given atomization inhalation therapy, the control group was given conventional nursing care on the basis of the atomization inhalation therapy, observation group on the basis of atomization inhalation therapy uplink comprehensive nursing, and the effect was compared. Results The observation group of patients after the treatment and nursing intervention of the total improvement rate was higher than the control group （P 〈 0.05）, anxiety self evaluation scale （SAS） score, depression self rating scale （SDS） score were （39.79±9.13）, （42.44±9.52） points, respectively, and quality of living conditions had significant advantages than the control group （P 〈 0.05）, at the same time, the observation group of patients after the treatment and nursing intervention of nursing satisfaction was 100.00%, which was signifcantly higher than that of control group （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of treating patients with chronic obstruction with respiratory failure in the treatment of atomized inhalation is signifcant.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第28期186-189,共4页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
慢阻肺
呼吸衰竭
雾化吸入
综合护理
生活质量
COPD
respiratory failure
inhalation
comprehensive care
quality of life
