摘要
目的探讨对肘关节骨折脱位分别以手术方法与保守方法治疗的临床效果。方法以随机方式抽取2014年1月—2017年1月曾在我院骨科接受治疗的肘关节骨折脱位患者106例,将患者分为观察组与对照组,对照组中患者选择保守方法进行治疗,观察组中患者以手术方法进行治疗,观察其临床效果。结果观察两组患者临床有效率,观察组患者总有效率为94.3%,对照组患者总有效率为75.5%;观察两组患者治疗前后肘关节功能评分,结果显示观察组患者改善情况优于对照组。结论在肘关节脱位临床治疗中,应用手术方法治疗效果优于保守方法效果,可使患者肘关节功能得以更好恢复,改善患者生活质量,在临床上应尽可能选择手术方法进行治疗。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of surgical treatment and conservative treatment for fracture dislocation of elbow joint. Methods 106 cases of elbow fracture dislocation patients were randomly selected from January 2014 to January 2017 and received treatment in the Department of orthopedics in our hospital, these patients were divided into observation group and control group, control group of patients with conservative treatment, the observation group of patients with surgical treatment, observe the clinical effect. Results The clinical efficiency of the two groups was observed. The total effective rate was 94.3% in the observation group and 75.5% in the control group. The elbow function score of the two groups before and after treatment was observed. The results showed that the improvement of the observation group was better than that of the control group. Conclusion In the clinical treatment of elbow dislocation, the application of surgical treatment is better than the conservative method, can make the elbow joint function of patients better recovery, improve the quality of life of patients, in clinical practice should be selected as possible surgical treatment.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第28期79-81,共3页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
肘关节骨折脱位
保守治疗
手术治疗
临床效果
elbow fracture dislocation
conservative treatment
surgical treatment
clinical effect
