期刊文献+

GRADE指南改编方法“ADOLOPMENT”介绍 被引量:11

Introduction of ADOLOPMENT:a GRADE guidelines development tool
原文传递
导出
摘要 在现有指南的基础上,结合特定地区的实际情况改编指南,可提高指南制订的效率,降低制订成本,缩短制订周期。"ADOLOPMENT"是由GRADE工作组基于国际标准化的指南制订流程开发的一种适用于指南改编的方法学工具。采用"ADOLOPMENT"方法改编指南,可高效利用现有指南及其证据,避免重复性证据评价工作,还能够全面记录指南从证据到推荐意见的过程,确保改编的透明性,有利于指南使用者了解指南的改编流程,以提高改编指南的可接受性和可信度。本文介绍"ADOLOPMENT"方法及其应用。 Adapting the existing guidelines in the context of specific regions can improve the efficiency of guidelines development, and reduce cost and time for developing guidelines. ADOLOPMENT is a methodological tool for guidelines adaptation, which was developed by the GRADE Working Group based on the standardized international guidelines making process. With ADOLOPMENT, developers can effectively use existing guidelines and evidence, avoid duplication of the evidence evaluation, and record the process from evidence to recommendations, which will ensure the transparency of adaptation, help users to understand the process, and improve the acceptability and credibility of guideline adaptation. This paper aims to introduce the ADOLOPMENT and its application.
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第1期109-115,共7页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金(编号781503459)
关键词 指南改编工具 GRADE ADOLOPMENT 方法学 Guidelines development tool GRADE ADOLOPMENT Methodology
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献56

  • 1赵亚利,崔树起,彭晓霞.国内临床指南发展现状及国内外指南比较分析[J].中国全科医学,2005,8(7):593-596. 被引量:24
  • 2陈灏珠.实用内科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009. 被引量:613
  • 3Field M, Lohr K. Clinical practice guidelines: directions for a new program. Washington, DC: National Academic Press; 1990. 被引量:1
  • 4Schunemann HJ, Woodhead M, Anzueto A, et al. A vision statement on guideline development for respiratory disease: the example of COPD. Lancet, 2009, 373: 774-779. 被引量:1
  • 5Guyatt G, Vist G, Falck-Ytter Y, et al. An emerging consensus on grading recommendations? ACP J Club, 2006, 144(1): A8-9. 被引量:1
  • 6Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 1170-1173. 被引量:1
  • 7Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336: 924-926. 被引量:1
  • 8Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ, 2008, 336: 995-998. 被引量:1
  • 9Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ, 2008, 336:1049-1051. 被引量:1
  • 10Schunemann HI, Oxman AD, Brozek l, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ, 2008, 336:1106-1110. 被引量:1

共引文献316

同被引文献98

引证文献11

二级引证文献249

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部