摘要
《民法总则》第191条确立了未成年人性自主决定权受到侵害情形的特殊诉讼时效中止规则。但对未成年人性侵害这个问题,还需要作三个方面的解释工作:首先,第191条应放置在侵权责任法体系中考虑,"性侵害"做"侵害性自主决定权"解释;其次,第191条存在法律漏洞,未将加害人是家庭共同生活成员等情形纳入考量,这些情形应当解释为《民法总则》第194条第1款第4项规定,"权利人被义务人或者其他人控制",得以适用的情形;再次,依据第191条的立法考量,根据事物的本质,性侵害未成年人所导致的特别心理障碍问题也应在时效上予以特别对待,纳入《民法总则》第194条第1款第5项,"其他导致权利人不能行使请求权的障碍",构成诉讼时效的中止事由。
China＇s Civil Law General Provisions Article 191 prescribes suspension of limitation for the sexual abuse ofminor.~. This provision is a great step forward in the protection of minor. But around the problem of sexual abuse against mi- nors, the work on the statute of limitations need to explain in three aspects： firstly, Article 191 should be placed in the tort liability system to explain, and the ＂sexual assault＂ should be interpreted as ＂Infringement of the Right to Sexual Self - de- termination＂ ; secondly, there is a lack of legislation, when special circumstances are not considered, for example when in- jurer is a member of the family. These circumstances should be interpreted as a situation of General Provisions Article 194 paragraph 1 subparagraph 4, ＂the victim is controlled by the obligor or others＂ ; thirdly, analogy the legislative considera- tions of Article 191, according the nature of things, the special psychological barriers resulting from sexual abuse of minors should be considered as ＂other＂ in Article 194 paragraph 1 subparagraph 5, constitute the suspension of limitation.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第1期130-139,共10页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
国家留学基金委(201506010318)"国家建设高水平大学公派研究生项目"
关键词
诉讼时效
未成年人
性侵害
性自主决定权
Statutes of limitations
Minor
Sexual abuse
Sexual self - determination right
