摘要
阿克曼主张权力正当性的基础在于政治对话的完满性,这一学说成为继罗尔斯之后又一新的理论焦点。政治对话中的限定性原则与公民资格是构建权力正当性理想图景的两个必备要素。限定性原则是让持有诸多互竞且不可通约善观念的自由而平等的公民在各种观念之间保持中立,是权力正当性的前提要件;而公民资格则是评判权力正当性的决定性要素,它要求政治对话者在那些涉及他们所倡导的原则及政策如何能够被公共理性的政治价值所支持的根本性问题上,能够向彼此提供合理性的解释。这两要素内在地统一于政治对话理论中,成为达致权力正当性的二维架构。
Ackermann＇s argument that the power legitimacy consists of the fulfillment of the political dialogue has become the new focus theory after John Rawls.In the political dialogue,the defining principle and the citizenship are the two essential elements to set up the ideal picture of power legitimacy.It is the contextual element of power legitimacy as far as the defining principle is concerned,it requires that the free and equal citizens with a lot of good ideas of mutual competition and incommensurability keep neutrality in warring views.But on the contrary,the citizenship is a determining factor to decide the power legitimacy,and demands that the political interlocutors in the question about the principles and policies supporting by political value of public rationality provide reasonable explanation for each other.These two elements are internally integrated into the political dialogue and become an important factor to achieve the power legitimacy
出处
《江苏大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2017年第6期43-47,共5页
Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目(16AJL005)
江苏省社科基金一般项目(16FXB006)
江苏省高校哲学社会科学一般项目(2016SJB820021)
江苏大学高级人才专项资助项目(11JDG186)
关键词
政治对话
权力正当性
限定性原则
公民资格
the political dialogue
the power legitimacy
defining principle
the citizenship
