摘要
目的:对比小切口无缝线非超声乳化白内障囊外摘除+人工晶状体植入术和超声乳化白内障吸除+人工晶状体植入术两种不同术式的临床疗效。方法:150例(150眼)老年性白内障患者随机分为两组:小切口组77眼,超声乳化组73眼,对术后视力、角膜散光度及术中、术后并发症进行对比观察。结果:两种手术方式的术后视力恢复和角膜散光度差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:超声乳化白内障吸除+人工晶状体植入术与小切口无缝线非超声乳化白内障囊外摘除+人工晶状体植入术均能有效改善患者视力,但超声乳化白内障吸除术的手术效果较好。
Objective： To compare the clinical effects of two different methods： small incision,non phacoemulsification,extracapsular cataract extraction with intraocular lens implantation,and phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.Methods： A hundred and fifty patients（150 eyes） with senile cataract were randomly divided into two groups：small incision group（77 eyes） and phacoemulsification group（73 eyes）.The postoperative visual acuity,corneal astigmatism and intraoperative and postoperative complications were observed and compared between the two groups.Results：After operation,there were significant differences between the two groups in visual acuity recovery and corneal astigmatism（P 〉 0.05）,and there was no significant difference in the postoperative complications in the two surgical method（P〉 0.05）.Conclusion： Both of the two kinds of operations can effectively improve the visual acuity of patients.However,the effect of phacoemulsification is better.
出处
《赣南医学院学报》
2017年第6期907-910,共4页
JOURNAL OF GANNAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY
关键词
老年性白内障
小切口
超声乳化术
senile cataract
small incision
phacoemulsification
