摘要
尽管王阳明很少论及《春秋》,但根据少量的文献,我们还是可以大致勾勒出他对《春秋》的基本看法。首先,作为心学的代表人物,王阳明的《春秋》学也打上了浓厚的心学色彩,从而视《春秋》为"正人心"之书;其次,在对《春秋》性质之认识上,阳明一方面视《春秋》为"史",但又不否认其之为"经",进而主张"五经亦史",从而表现出一种亦经亦史的《春秋》观;再次,王阳明在其《论元年春王正月》一文中,在义理与考据两方面专门针对胡安国的"夏时冠周月"说提出批评,这是王阳明留存唯一完整的一篇《春秋》学论文,弥足珍贵。虽然从整个《春秋》学史上看,阳明所代表的《春秋》观,作为宋明《春秋》学之绪余,并没有太高的地位。但不论是阳明整体学术而论,还是就《春秋》学史而论,述阳明之《春秋》学,多少有拾遗补阙的意义。
Although Wang Yangming seldom discussed Spring and Autumn Annals,we can roughly outline his basic view s on this book from related literature. First,as a representative of the philosophy of the mind,Wang Yangming highlighted the philosophy of the mind on his study of Spring and Autumn Annals.Secondly,he regarded Spring and Autumn Annalsas ＂history＂ on the one hand,but did not deny it as ＂the Book of Classics＂,and further advocated ＂the Five Classics are history at all＂,thus showing a view of Spring and Autumn Annals as both history and classic. Thirdly,in his article ＂On Yuan Nian Chun Wang Zheng Yue＂,Wang Yangming specifically criticized Hu Anguo＇s view of ＂Xia Shi Guan Zhou Yue＂.Precious as it was,this paper was the only complete dissertation on Spring and Autumn Annals of Wang Yangming left behind. From the academic history on the study of Spring and Autumn Annals,Wang Yangming＇s view didn＇t receive high status in the Song and Ming dynasties. However,in terms of the overall study of Wang Yangming and the historical study of Spring and Autumn Annals,it is of some significance to carry out the study on Wang Yangming ＇s view of Spring and Autumn Annals.
出处
《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第6期40-45,共6页
Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
王阳明
《春秋》
夏时冠周月
Wang Yangming
Spring and Autumn Annals
＂Xia Shi Guan Zhou Yue＂
