摘要
《〈林泉高致集·画记〉与郭熙》一文由日本美术史学者铃木敬撰写。此前,中国美术史学者薄松年和陈少丰曾发表过一篇名为《读〈林泉高致·画记〉札记》的论文,其中的部分观点和内容引发了铃木敬的质疑,故有此文。从文中可以看出铃木敬严谨的考据态度和敏感的问题意识,但同时也反映出他对薄、陈论文的曲解和误读。此后,薄、陈又发表了《郭熙父子与〈林泉高致〉》一文,对铃木敬的质疑做出回应,并进一步深入、细化了研究内容。阅读中外学者的三篇文章,可以领略他们之间积极的学术争鸣活动。每次争鸣以回应和商榷为出发点,进而通过双方精密的文献考证和追求极致的学术态度,使得对于《林泉高致》以及郭熙、郭思其人其事的相关研究更加深入。
＂Hua Ji＇ in Lin Quan Gao Zhi fi and Guo Xi＂ was written by Suzuki Kei, a famous Japanese scholar of art history. Before that article, Chinese historical scholars Bo Songnian and Chen Shaofeng had published a paper titled ＂Reading ＇Hua Ji＇ in Lin Quan Gao Zhi＂ which was then challenged by Suzuki Kei. Kei＇s article reflects his rigorous textual research attitude and sharp awareness of problem as well as his misinterpretation of Bo and Chen＇s argument. In response to Suzuki Kei＇s challenge, Bo and Chen did further research and published ＂Guo Xi ＆ His Son and Lin Quan Gao Zhi＂. Scholars＇ academic contending is distinctly revealed in those three articles. Besides controversy, their meticulous textual research promoted the study of Lin Quan Gao Zhi as well as Guo Xi and Guo Si.
出处
《中国国家博物馆馆刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第12期80-85,共6页
Journal of National Museum of China
关键词
铃木敬
薄松年
陈少丰
郭熙
林泉高致
Suzuki Kei
Bo Songnian
Chen Shaofeng
Guo Xi
Lin Quan Gao Zhi
