摘要
目的比较Single bond universal粘结剂、Opti Bond FL粘结剂以及i Bond粘结剂用于恒磨牙牙体缺损修复的临床疗效。方法将87例患者的173颗患牙随机分为3组。A组(n=58):Opti bond FL全酸蚀粘结剂(全酸蚀模式);B组(n=58):Single bond universal粘结剂(自酸蚀模式);C组(n=57):i Bond自酸蚀粘结剂(选择性酸蚀模式)。3组均结合Kerr sonic fill超声树脂充填修复。修复后6个月、12个月及18个月进行回访,检查牙体缺损修复效果及牙髓状况。结果修复6个月、12个月、18个月后,3组修复成功率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。操作时间方面Single bond universal粘结剂与其余两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在本实验条件下,Single bond universal粘结剂可以达到Opti bond FL及i Bond粘结剂的粘结效果,同时Single bond universal粘结剂操作时间更短。
Objective To evaluated the clinical curative effect and operation time of universal adhesives,total-etching adhesives and self-etching adhesives for permanent molar defect repair. Methods One hundred and seventy three molar teeth in 87 patients with defect were randomly divided into 3 groups,Opti bond FL adhesives in total-etching mode（ Group A）,Single bond universal adhesives in self-etching mode（ Group B）,i Bond adhesive in selective etching mode（ Group C）,and all of the 3 groups were repaired with Kerr sonic fill ultrasonic resin. After 6 months,12 months and 18 months,the patients were examined with the filling materials and the dental pulp. Results After 6 months,12 months and 18 months,there was no significant difference in the success rate between the three groups（ P 〈0. 05）. The operation time of Single bond universal adhesives was shorter than other two kinds of adhesives（ P 〈0. 05）. Conclusion All of the three adhesives have good bonding property in the repair of dental defects. The single bond universal adhesive has more shorter operation time.
出处
《潍坊医学院学报》
2017年第5期333-335,共3页
Acta Academiae Medicinae Weifang
