期刊文献+

肌间沟臂丛阻滞不同按压法在锁骨骨折手术中的效果观察 被引量:1

Observation on the Effect of Different Compression Methods of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Clavicle Fracture Surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞两种不同按压法在锁骨骨折手术中的麻醉效果。方法 60例行锁骨骨折手术患者,随机分为对照组和实验组,每组各30例。两组局麻药均为0.8%利多卡因+0.795%甲磺酸罗哌卡因25 ml。对照组肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞边注药边按压阻滞点下方直到注药后5分钟。实验组肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞,注药完毕后再按压注射点下方5分钟。两组均采用优、良、差三级评定麻醉效果。结果实验组优良率为93%,对照组为57%。实验组的优良率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在锁骨骨折手术中,肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞,先注药后压迫法,简单易行,麻醉效果更好,是一种更有效的麻醉方法。 Objective To observe the anesthetic effect of two different pressing methods of interscalene brachial plexus block in clavicle fracture surgery.Methods 60 cases of clavicular fracture surgery patients are randomly divided into control group and experimental group,with 30 cases in each group.The two groups of local anesthetics were 0.8% lidocaine+0.795% ropivacaine mesylate 25 ml.In control group,when taking interscalene brachial plexus block method,press below part of the blockage point while injecting drug,and then keep it for five minutes afterinjection.In experimental group,when taking interscalene brachial plexus block method,press the below part of injection point for 5 minutes after the injection.The two groups both evaluate anesthetic effect with three levels of excellent,good,poor.Results The excellent and good rate of the experimental group was 93%,that of control group was 57%.The excellent rate of experimental group was significantly higher than the control group(P〈0.05).Conclusion In the clavicular fracture surgery,interscalene brachial plexus block is a more effective method of anesthesia to inject first and then compress,which is convenient and has better anesthetic effect.
作者 周少武
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2017年第31期56-58,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 锁骨 骨折 神经传导阻滞 臂丛 按压法 clavicalis cataclasis nerve block brachial plexus pressing
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献46

  • 1姜维.肌间沟臂丛复合颈丛阻滞用于肩、锁部位手术临床效果观察[J].实用全科医学,2004,2(5):405-406. 被引量:1
  • 2薛富善.周围神经阻滞原理与实践[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.20-78. 被引量:8
  • 3庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:475-487. 被引量:251
  • 4庄心良,曾因明,陈伯銮.现代麻醉学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:446-447 被引量:83
  • 5Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, et al. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block : a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. Br J An- aesth ,2009,102 ( 3 ) :408-417. 被引量:1
  • 6Capdevila X, Biboulet P, Morau D, et al. How and why to use ultra- sound for regional blockade [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg, 2008,59 (3) :147-154. 被引量:1
  • 7van Geffen GJ, van den Broek E, Braak G J, et al. A prospective ran- domized trial of ultrasound guided versus nerve stimulation guided dis- tal sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa [ J ]. Anaesth Intensive Care,2009,37 ( 1 ) :32-37. 被引量:1
  • 8胥少汀,葛宝丰,徐印坎.实用骨科学[M].4版.北京:人民军医出版社,2012:608. 被引量:192
  • 9朱林.臂丛神经阻滞致心跳骤停1例.中国基层医药,2009.16:16. 被引量:1
  • 10?ivind Klaastad,?rjan Smedby,Gale E. Thompson,Terje Tillung,Per Kristian Hol,Jan S. R?tnes,Per Brodal,Harald Breivik,Karl R. Hetland,Erik T. Fosse.Distribution of Local Anesthetic in Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study[J].Anesthesiology.2002(6) 被引量:1

共引文献82

同被引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部