摘要
干洗作为纺织品的护理方式之一,在护理标签中有相关标注。通过对测试条件及实验结果进行分析,比较ISO、GB、JIS和AATCC四种护理标签中所涉及耐干洗色牢度标准的异同。通过分析可知,四种标准测试原理和所用设备一致,但测试条件不同。测试结果表明,四种样品的变色等级一致,沾色等级大部分一致,部分JIS试样沾色等级较低。对比单纤维和多纤维贴衬测试结果可知,两种贴衬测试结果不可等同,且单纤维贴衬测试更严格。
Dry cleaning, as one of the care methods, has been labelled. The similarities and differences of color fastness to dry cleaning standards among ISO, GB, JIS, and AATCC were compared by analyzing the test conditions and results. It is shown that the test principles and equipment used are the same but test conditionsdifferent are different in four standards. The test results demonstrated that the discoloration grades of four samples were exactly consistent and staining grades were partly consistent, only some JIS samples showed lower staining grades. The lining tests of singlefiber and multi-fiber indicated that two results were not equivalent and the test methods for single-fiber were stricter.
出处
《染整技术》
CAS
北大核心
2017年第11期51-56,共6页
Textile Dyeing and Finishing Journal
关键词
护理标签
耐干洗色牢度
标准
对比
care label
colorfastness to dry cleaning
standards
comparison
