摘要
近年来,美国学者莫斯利、中国学者孟捷和韩国学者柳东民在《激进政治经济学评论》上围绕"劳动时间的货币表现"(MELT)产生一系列争论。本文通过梳理这次争论认为,导致争论产生的原因之一是不同学者对MELT的定义不同,因此应明确MELT的定义。其次,MELT决定是否与剩余价值实现相关是另一个分歧所在,一方面这是定义不同产生的分歧,但另一方面也关系着如何将MELT扩展到具体层面,应用于经验分析,并通过统计数据验证马克思的基本理论。这对发展MELT以至于发展马克思基本理论具有重要的意义。
In recent years, American scholar Fred Mosley, Chinese scholar Meng Jie and Korean scholar Rieu Dong-Min have involved into a series of arguments around the ＂Monetary Expression of Labor Time＂ （MELT） in ＂Review of Radical Political Economics＂. By combing these debates, this paper argues that one of the reasons for the controversy is that different scholars have different definitions of MELT, while the other difference includes whether MELT is related to the realization of surplus value. On the one hand, these controversies are differences arising from defining differences , on the other hand, these are also related to how to expand MELT to the concrete level, and the basic theory of Marx through statistical data. This is of great significance for the development of MELT and the development of Marx＇s basic theory.
出处
《教学与研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第12期68-73,共6页
Teaching and Research
基金
中央高校基本科研业务费"马克思主义学院科研团队与公共科研平台支持项目"(项目号:2017RW006)和"师生员工马克思主义理论教育通俗化研究"(项目号:2017RW050)的阶段性成果
关键词
劳动时间的货币表现
信用货币
资本积累
剩余价值生产
剩余价值实现
monetary expression of labor time
credit money
capital accumulation
surplus value production
surplus value realization
