期刊文献+

内镜下十二指肠乳头切开术联合气囊扩张术治疗胆总管结石合并十二指肠乳头旁憩室的临床研究 被引量:1

Clinical study on endoscopic sphincterotomy combined with endoscopic papillo-sphincter balloon dilatation in the treatment of choledocholithiasis complicating by duodenal diverticulum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术(endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy,EST)联合气囊扩张术(endoscopic papillo-sphincter balloon dilatation,EPBD)治疗胆总管结石合并十二指肠乳头旁憩室的临床价值。方法回顾性分析2014年1月至2016年5月166例胆总管结石合并十二指肠乳头旁憩室的患者,其中单用EST治疗的患者50例为EST组,单用EPBD治疗的患者50例为EPBD组,EST联合EPBD治疗的患者66例为联合组,比较两组患者一次性取石成功率、复发率及并发症发生率的差异。结果联合组一次性取石成功率(97.0%)高于单用EST组(90.0%)和单用EPBD组(92.0%),但差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。联合组出血发生率(3.0%)明显低于EST组(12.0%),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),与单用EPBD组(2.0%)比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。联合组急性胰腺炎或高淀粉酶血症的发生率(6.1%)明显低于EPBD组(26.0%),差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。术后三组患者间穿孔的发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。联合组复发率(3.0%)与单用EST组(6.0%)和单用EPBD组(4.0%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论EST与EPBD联合治疗胆总管结石合并十二指肠乳头旁憩室能提高手术成功率且降低部分并发症的发生率,是更加有效、安全的治疗方式。 Objective To explore the clinical value of endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) combined with endoscopic papillo-sphincter balloon dilatation (EPBD) in the treatment of choledocholithiasis complicating by duodenal diverticulum. Methods 166 cases of choledocholithiasis complicating by duodenal diverticulum from January 2014 to May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed, 50 cases treated by EST as EST group, 50 cases treated by EPBD as EPBD group, 66 cases treated by EST combined with EPBD as combination group. The one-time success rate of stone removal, the recurrence rate, and the complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The one-time success rate of stone removal in the combination group (97.0%) was significantly higher than that in EST group (90.0%) and EPBD group (92.0%), but without statistically significant difference (P〉0.05). The rate of bleeding in the combination group (3.0%) was significantly lower than that in EST group (12.0%) (P〈0.05), but without statistically significant difference compared with EPBD group (2.0%) (P〉0.05). The rate of acute pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia in the combination group (6.1%) was significantly lower than that in EPBD group (26.0%), with statistically significant difference (P〈0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of perforation among the three groups (P〉0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the recurrence rate among the combination group (3.0%), EST group (6.0%), EPBD group (4.0%) (P〉0.05). Conclusion EST combined with EPBD in the treatment of choledocholithiasis complicating by duodenal diverticulum can improve the success rate of surgery and reduce some complications, is a kind of more effective and safer treatment method.
作者 薛斌 张道选
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2017年第24期3881-3884,共4页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术 内镜下气囊扩张术 联合治疗 胆总管结石 十二指肠乳头旁憩室 Endoscopic sphincterotomy Endoscopic papillo-sphincter balloon dilatation Combined treatment Choledocholithiasis Duodenal diverticulum
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献52

  • 1王坚,郝立校,焦成文,皋岚雅,王惠菊,丁新峰,蔡珍福,顾树南.胆管内用药预防内镜下胰胆管逆行造影所致急性胰腺炎[J].东南国防医药,2009,11(1):17-19. 被引量:1
  • 2龚彪.改良内镜下乳头气囊扩张术应用的可行性研究[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2006,23(6):407-409. 被引量:25
  • 3王建承,张桌,林谋斌,陆晔.鼻胆管引流对于ERCP术后并发症的防治[J].肝胆胰外科杂志,2006,18(6):364-366. 被引量:22
  • 4罗珉,李培明,李克,张威浩.内镜下十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术治疗十二指肠乳头旁憩室合并胆总管结石的临床研究[J].中国内镜杂志,2007,13(2):157-159. 被引量:22
  • 5SUGIYAMA M,ATOMI Y.Follow-up of more than 10 years after endoscopic sphineterotomy for eholedocholithiasis in young patients[J].Br J Surg,1998:85(7):917-921. 被引量:1
  • 6Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ, Macmathuna P, PetersenBT, Jaffe PE, Morales TG, Hixson LJ, Sherman S, Lehman GA,Jamal MM, Al-Kawas FH, Khandelwal M, Moore JP, DerfusGA, Jamidar PA, Ramirez FC, Ryan ME, Woods KL, Carr-Locke DL, Alder SC. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared withsphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology2004; 127: 1291-1299 [PMID: 15520997]. 被引量:1
  • 7Poincloux L, Rouquette O, Privat J, Gorce D, Abergel A, DapoignyM, Bommelaer G. Large-balloon dilation of the sphincter of Oddiafter sphincterotomy or infundibulotomy to extract large calculior multiple common bile duct stones without using mechanicallithotripsy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2013; 48: 246-251 [PMID:22229762]. 被引量:1
  • 8Stefanidis G, Viazis N, Pleskow D, Manolakopoulos S, TheocharisL, Christodoulou C, Kotsikoros N, Giannousis J, Sgouros S,Rodias M, Katsikani A, Chuttani R. Large balloon dilation vs.mechanical lithotripsy for the management of large bile duct stones:a prospective randomized study. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106:278-285 [PMID: 21045816 DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.421]. 被引量:1
  • 9Teoh AY, Cheung FK, Hu B, Pan YM, Lai LH, Chiu PW, Wong SK,Chan FK, Lau JY. Randomized trial of endoscopic sphincterotomywith balloon dilation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy alone forremoval of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 2013; 144: 341-345.e1 [PMID: 23085096 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.027]. 被引量:1
  • 10Kuo CM, Chiu YC, Changchien CS, Tai WC, Chuah SK, Hu TH,Kuo YH, Kuo CH. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for removalof bile duct stones: evaluation of outcomes and complicationsin 298 patients. J Clin Gastroenterol 2012; 46: 860-864 [PMID:23060218 DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182617a42. 被引量:1

共引文献105

同被引文献13

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部