期刊文献+

鼻咽癌常规放疗与调强放疗远期并发症及疗效的对比分析 被引量:2

Comparative Analysis of Long-term Complications and Curative Effect of Conventional Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析鼻咽癌常规放疗和放射治疗远期并发症和治疗效果。方法抽取我院100例鼻咽癌患者为研究对象。将其随机分为对照组和观察组。对照组采用常规治疗,观察组实施调强放疗,比较两组患者治疗后远期并发症和生存情况。结果观察组口干、颈部纤维化和放射性脑病发生概率低于对照组,两组4~6年后生存率相比,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者1~3年生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论调强放疗法治疗鼻咽癌,远期生存率高,并发症概率低,效果明显。 Objective To compare conventional radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy and the long-term complications and treatment. Methods 100 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in our hospital were selected as the research objects. They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group. The control group received conventional treatment, and the observation group received intensity modulated radiation therapy. The long-term complications and survival of the two groups were compared. Results The incidence of dry mouth, neck fibrosis and radiation encephalopathy in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the survival rate of the two groups after 4~6 years was significantly different(P 〈 0.05); There was no significant difference in 1~3 years survival rate between the two groups(P〉 0.05). Conclusion Intensity modulated radiotherapy has a high long-term survival rate, low complication probability and obvious effect in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
作者 国志勇
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2017年第27期79-80,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 鼻咽癌 常规放疗 调强放疗 并发症 nasopharyngeal carcinoma conventional radiotherapy intensity modulated radiation therapy complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献58

  • 1雷新,杨晓霞,王东,胡南,刘岩海.鼻咽癌调强放疗和常规放疗早期反应的对照观察[J].解放军医学杂志,2005,30(11):965-966. 被引量:30
  • 2Kam MK, Teo PM, Chau RM, et al. Treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy: the Hong Kong experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2004, 60 (5) :1440-1450. 被引量:1
  • 3Fang FM, Chiu HC, Kuo WR, et al. Health-related quality of life for nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with cancer-free survival after treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2002, 53 (4) :959-968. 被引量:1
  • 4Chambers MS, Garden AS, Kies MS, et al. Radiation-induced xeros- tomia in patients with head and neck cancer: pathogenesis, impact on quality of life, and management. Head Neck, 2004, 26 ( 9 ) : 796- 807. 被引量:1
  • 5Eisbruch A, Ten Haken RK, Kim HM, et al. Dose, volume, and function relationships in parotid salivary glands following conformal and intensity-modulated irradiation of head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999, 45 (3) :577-587. 被引量:1
  • 6Pow EH, Kwong DL, McMillan AS, et al. Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiothera- py for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: initial report on a ran- domized controlled clinical trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2006, 66(4) : 981-991. 被引量:1
  • 7Kam MK, Leung SF, Zee B, et al. Prospective randomized study of intensity-modulated radiotherapy on salivary gland function in early- stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. J Clin Oncol, 2007, 25 (31) :4873-4879. 被引量:1
  • 8Kwong DL, McMillan AS, Pow EH, et al. A randomized trim compa- ring intensity modulated radiotherapy versus 2-dimensional radiothera- py for stage H nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol, 2008, 72 Suppl 1 :$98. 被引量:1
  • 9张振坤.鼻咽癌调强放疗与常规放疗的疗效及副反应对比研究.南宁:广西医科大学,2010. 被引量:1
  • 10Eisbruch A, Kim HM, Terre11 JE, et al. Xerostomia and its predic- tors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2001, 50(3) :695-704. 被引量:1

共引文献65

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部