期刊文献+

全腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术的手术方式及疗效随访评价 被引量:2

Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Rectal Cancer:Surgical Methods and Follow-up Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨全腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术的手术方式及其随访疗效。方法选择我院2013年1月—2015年1月收治的直肠癌患者80例作为研究对象。入组对象有完整临床资料,自愿接受研究。采用随机数表法,将其分为两组,每组各40例。对照组患者按照传统根治术治疗,研究组患者按照全腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果。结果与对照组对比,研究组患者手术时间更长,术中出血量更少,术后肠蠕动恢复时间、肛门排气时间、导管留置时间、住院时间更短,并发症发生率更低,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组随访1年,2年时复发率与生存率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相比传统直肠癌根治术而言,全腹腔镜下直肠癌根治术尽管手术时间更长,但可减少术中出血与并发症发生,促进术后更快康复,而且随访期间复发率低,生存率高。 Objective To explore the operation of total laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer and its follow-up effect. Methods 80 patients with rectal cancer treated in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were selected as the research objects. The enrolled subjects had complete clinical data and voluntarily accepted the study. Using a random number table method, it can be divided into two groups, 40 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with traditional radical mastectomy. Patients in the study group were treated with laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. The therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results Compared with the control group, The operation time about the patients in the study group was longer, the intraoperative bleeding was less. The postoperative intestinal peristalsis recovery time, anal exhaust time, catheter indwelling time, shorter hospital stay, the complication rate were lower, the differences were statistically significant(P 〈 0.05); The two groups were followed up for 1 year and 2 years, and there were no statistically significant differences in comparing the recurrence rate and survival rate between two groups(P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional radical resection of rectal cancer, total laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer, although longer operation time, which can reduce intraoperative bleeding and complications, to promote faster recovery after surgery, and follow-up during the recurrence rate is low, high survival rate.
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2017年第27期66-67,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 全腹腔镜 直肠癌根治术 复发率 生存率 total laparoscopy rectal cancer radical resection recurrence rate survival rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献91

  • 1金红旭,张雪峰,张智丽,李瑾,王希泽,宗修锟.腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌的随访资料分析[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(11):1185-1187. 被引量:2
  • 2江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1353
  • 3兰跃福,屈统红,陈光,等.加速康复外科在腹腔镜直肠癌保肛手术中的临床研究[A].浙江省大肠肛门病学术交流会暨肛肠外科新技术培训资料汇编,2009,17(19):110. 被引量:2
  • 4BARRIENTOS S, STOJADINOVIC O, GOLINKO M S, et al. Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing[ J]. Wound RepairRegen, 2008, 16(5) : 585 -601. 被引量:1
  • 5BAO P, KODRA A, TOMIC CANIC M, et al. The role of vasu lar endothelial gowth factor in wound healing [ J ]. J Surg Res 2009, 153(2): 347-358. 被引量:1
  • 6WILMORE D W, KEHLET H. Management of patients in fast track surgery[J]. BMJ, 2001, 322(7284): 473 -476. 被引量:1
  • 7KEHLET H, WILMORE D W. Multi - modal strategies to imprcve surgical outcome[J]. Am J Surg, 2002, 183(6) : 630 -641. 被引量:1
  • 8MARCO S, CATIZZI M D, KATRIN C, et al. Fast -track surgery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is it feasible in a general sur- gery unit? [J]. Surgery, 2010, 147(2) : 219-226. 被引量:1
  • 9WSTSON K, RINOMHOTA S. Preoperative fasting: we need a new consensus I J 1. Nurs Times, 2002, 98 (15) : 36 -37. 被引量:1
  • 10BELIZON A, BALIK E, HORST P, et al. Persistent elevation of plasma vasculm" endothelial growth factor levels during the first nmnth after minimally invasive methods [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22 (2) : 287 - 297. 被引量:1

共引文献117

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部