摘要
围绕1950年江津县的"退押运动"展开的争论,反映了土地改革研究中两种不同的研究路径:一是经济层面上的地权交易,一是政治意义上的革命动员。法币贬值与押租制度虽然存在联系,却无法推翻"退押属于产权清算"的论点。由于押金价值只与押金交纳时的谷物购买力相关,所以法币贬值与押金贬值之间并不存在绝对的因果联系。因货币贬值引起的租佃纠纷,本质上是如何均衡与分摊金融风险的问题。
Debates surrounding the ＂movement to return deposits＂ in Jiangjin County throughout 1950s reflect two different approaches to research on land reform： one is the exchange of land rights at an economic level and the other is revolutionary mobilization in a political sense. Although connections existed between the depreciation of legal tender and the deposit and rental system, this fact cannot refute the argument that ＂the return of deposits was an act of liquidating property rights. ＂ Because the value of the deposits was only related to the purchasing power of grain when making the deposits, the depreciation of legal tender and the depreciation of the deposits did not have an absolute cause-and-effect relationship. Against the backdrop of a currency devaluation, the essence of the land tenancy disputes was a problem of distributing and allocating financial risks.
出处
《中共党史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第11期110-118,125,共10页
CPC History Studies
