期刊文献+

注水式结肠镜与传统注气式结肠镜在肠镜检查中的应用比较 被引量:1

A Comparative Study of the Application Effects of Water Injection Colonoscopy and Conventional Gas Injection Colonoscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察比较注水式结肠镜与传统注气式结肠镜在肠镜检查中的临床应用效果。方法:选取医院接收的进行肠镜检查患者120例,平均分成两组,对照组患者行传统的注气式结肠镜检查,观察组实施注水式结肠镜方式进行检查,观察两组患者使用后临床应用效果。结果:观察组患者的检查时间长于对照组、疼痛评分比较低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:使用注水式结肠镜对患者进行临床检查的效果更好,值得进行推广使用。 Objective:To study and analyze the clinical effects of water injection colonoscopy and conventional gas injection colonoscopy.Methods:120 cases of the colonoscopy examination in the Fifth People's Hospital of Shangrao City had been chosen and divided into two groups,the control group treated with the conventional gas injection colonoscopy and the observation group with the water injectioncolonoscopy.The clinical effects of two groups has beenobserved.Results:The examination time of the observation group was longer than that of the control group,the pain scorelower thanthe control group,and there being significantly statistic differencesbetween 2 groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:The use of the water injection colonoscopy in clinical examination has better effects and it is worthpromoting.
作者 韩建高
出处 《长江大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2017年第24期18-19,共2页 Journal of Yangtze University(Natural Science Edition)
关键词 注水式结肠镜 注气式结肠镜 肠镜检查 应用效果 water injection colonoscopy gas injection colonoscopy colonoscopy application effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1LEUNG FW, HARKER JO, JACKSON G, et al. A proof-of-prin- ciple, prospective, randomized controlled trial demonstrating im- proved outcomes in scheduled unsedated colonoscopy by the wa- ter method[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2010, 72(4): 693-700. 被引量:1
  • 2LAI E J, CALDERWOOD A, DOROS G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale:a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 69(3 Pt 2): 620-625. 被引量:1
  • 3REX DK, KHALFAN HK. Sedation and the technical perfor- mance of colonoscopy[J]. Gastmintest Endosc Clin N Am, 2005, 15(4): 661-672. 被引量:1
  • 4LEUNG FW, AMATO A, ELL C, et al. Water-aided colonoscopy: a systematic review [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2012, 76 (3): 657-666. 被引量:1
  • 5BAUMANN UA. Water intubation of the sigmoid colon: water instillation speeds up left-sided colonoscopy[J]. Endoscopy, 1999,31(4): 314-317. 被引量:1
  • 6LEUNG IW, MANN SK, SIAO-SALERA R, et al. A randomized, controlled comparison of warm water infusion in lieu of air in- sufflation versus air insufflation for aiding colonoscopy insertion in sedated patients undergoing coloreetal cancer screening and surveillance[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2009, 70(3): 505-510. 被引量:1
  • 7PARK SC, KEUM B, KIM ES, et al. Usefulness of warm water and oil assistance in colonoscopy by trainees[J]. Dig Dis Sci, 2010, 55(10): 2940-2944. 被引量:1
  • 8AMATO A, RADAELLI F, PAGGI S, et al. Carbon dioxide in- sufflatian or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(4): 511-518. 被引量:1
  • 9LIN S, ZHU W, XIAO K, et al. Water intuhation method can reduce patients' pain and sedation rate in eolonoscopy: a meta-analysis[J]. Dig Endosc, 2013, 25(3): 231-240. 被引量:1
  • 10LUO H, ZHANG L, LIU X, et al. Water exchange enhanced cecal intubation in potentially difficult colonoscopy. Unsedated patients with prior abdominal or pelvic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2013, 77(5):. 被引量:1

共引文献23

同被引文献18

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部