期刊文献+

经皮肾镜取石术治疗老年输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的效果及对肾功能的影响

Effect of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy on Upper Ureteral Calculi in Elderly Patients and Its Effect on Renal Function
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究经皮肾镜取石术治疗老年输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的效果及对肾功能的影响。方法:将某院接受治疗的60例输尿管上段嵌顿性结石老年患者随机分为两组,30位患者给予经尿道输尿管镜取石术(对照组),30位给予经皮肾镜取石术(观察组),对比两组患者结石清除率、手术时间、术中出血量等各项数据。结果:观察组患者结石清除率明显优于对照组,观察组患者在手术时间、术中出血量、肉眼血尿时间、住院时间及总花费均高于对照组,观察组患者并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:输尿管上段嵌顿性结石老年患者选择经皮肾镜取石术有更高的结石清除率,显著降低患者并发症发生率,可作为输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的首选治疗方式。 Objective: To evaluate the effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of upper ureteral calculi in elderly patients and its effect on renal function. Methods: 60 cases of elderly patients who accepted percutaneous nephrolithotomy on upper ure!eral calculi in a hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups, 30 patients received transurethral ureteroscopy (control group), 30 patients given percutaneous nephrolithotomy (observation group). The stone clearance rate, operation time and the amount of bleeding during operation were compared between the two groups. Results: The stone removal rate in observation group was significantly better than the control group. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding, hematuria time, hospitalization time and the total cost in observation group were higher than the control group. The complication rate of observation group was lower than that of control group (P〈0.05). Conclusion: PCNL procedure has the advantages of higher clearance rate for patients with upper ureteral calculi, and can significantly reduce the incidence of complications. Therefore it can be used as the preferred treatment for upper ureteral calculi.
出处 《数理医药学杂志》 2017年第12期1790-1791,共2页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine
关键词 经皮肾镜取石术 输尿管上段嵌顿性结石 经尿道输尿管镜取石术 肾功能 percutaneous nephrolithotomy upper ureteral calculi transurethral ureteroscopic lithotripsy renal function
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1周祥福,高新,温机灵,肖翠兰,温晓飞,杨波,陆佳荪,陈兴屹,孙颖浩.平卧位微穿刺造瘘经皮肾镜碎石取石术56例报告[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(11):728-730. 被引量:56
  • 2李勇,刘忠元,王三富,张剑波,唐建生,曾荣,刘潭军.微创经皮肾取石术并发症[J].湘南学院学报(医学版),2007,9(1):39-40. 被引量:21
  • 3路继儒,郑汝强,张嶂彬.双"J"管置管时间对输尿管功能的影响[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2000,21(4):201-203. 被引量:1
  • 4Perez Castro E, Osther P J, Jinga V, et al. Differences in ureteroscopie stone treatment and outcomes for dis- tal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study[J]. Euro Urol, 2014, 66 (1): 102-109. 被引量:1
  • 5Ding H, Wang Z, Du W, et al. Ntrap in prevention of stone migration during ureteroscopic lithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: A meta-analysis[J]. J En- dourol, 2012, 26(2):130-134. 被引量:1
  • 6Wang C J, Huang S W, Chang C H. Randomized trial of ntrap for proximal ureteral stones [J]. Urology, 2011, 77(3): 553-557. 被引量:1
  • 7Wu C F, Chen C S, Lin W Y, et al. Therapeutic op- tions for proximal ureter stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium: Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy [J]. Urology, 2005, 65(6): 1075-1079. 被引量:1
  • 8Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Albanis S, et al. Manage- ment and follow-up of impacted ureteral stones [J]. Urol Int, 2003, 70(4): 269-272. 被引量:1
  • 9Lam J S, Greene T D, Gupta M. Treatment of proxi- mal ureteral calculi: Holmium: Yag laser ureterolitho- tripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167(5): 1972-1976. 被引量:1
  • 10Tombal B, Mawlawi H, Feyaerts A, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (eswl) on the short-time out- come of symptomatic ureteral stones[J]. Euro Urol, 2005, 47(6): 855-859. 被引量:1

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部