摘要
当社会开始向后情感阶段迈进,情感研究将面临新的发展境遇。从研究定位上看,当代情感社会学研究,一方面与经典现代性的二元议题不同,同时也与后现代之情感虚无议题殊异。纵观西方社会学史,从埃利亚斯对早期现代社会的文明化探索开始,再到当代承继文化批判传统的梅斯特洛维奇那里,后情感化因子早已埋藏于现代化进程中许久,表现在个体化时代以"他者导向"的心理与行为模式变迁上。因此,对这一社会境遇的历史发生解读将有助于理解当下现实,并为社会学想象力在情感研究上提供历史的时空拓展可能。
During the post emotional stage, the sociology of emotion will enter a new era. From the perspective of Stephen Mestrovic, the research will not only differ from the classical sociologist when they researched in binary way, but also differ from post-modern way of thinking. Within the history of sociology,from Norbert Elias to Stephen Mestrovic, there is a long history of the development of post emotional process, and it can be figure out with inner-directed behave model. Firstly, this paper is to compare the difference of idea between Elias and Mestrovic aimed to retrospect historical mechanism of post emotional society,and then put Mills' s concept sociological imagination in such context to see whether there is an innovative capacity in current society.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第11期80-88,共9页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
浙江省哲学社会科学基金项目<诺贝特.埃利亚斯的型构社会学思想研究>资助(课题编号:18NDJC248YB)
关键词
后情感主义
情感社会学
埃利亚斯
文明进程
社会学想象力
post emotionism
Emotional Sociology
Elias
civilization process
sociological imagination
