期刊文献+

腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的临床效果分析

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy in the Treatment of Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对肝内胆管结石患者应用腹腔镜肝切除术治疗的效果进行探讨。方法选取88例肝内胆管结石患者进行分组比较,各组44例。观察组给予腹腔镜肝切除术治疗,对照组给予开腹手术治疗,比较两组临床综合指标,总结治疗经验。结果与对照组相比,观察组的手术时间、术中出血量、下床活动时间、恢复进食时间和住院时间均比较优,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义;观察组的结石清除率高于对照组,结石复发率低于对照组,且观察组的术后并发症发生率显低于对照组,P<0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜肝切除术以创伤小、出血量少、术后恢复快等优点,在肝内胆管结石治疗方面取得了较好的效果,且方案安全性高。 Objective To investigate the efect of laparoscopic hepatectomy in patients with hepatolithiasis. Methods 88 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones were divided into groups, 44 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with laparoscopic hepatectomy, the control group was treated with open surgery, the clinical indicators of the two groups were compared, and the treatment experience was summarized. Results Compared with the control group, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, ambulation time, recovery time and hospital stay in the observation group were better, P 〈 0.05, the difference was statistically signifcant; The stone clearance rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, the stone recurrence rate was lower than that of the control group, and the incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was signifcantly lower than that of the control group, P 〈 0.05, the diference was statistically signifcant. Conclusion Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic hepatectomy has the advantages of less trauma, less blood loss, rapid postoperative recovery, and has achieved good results in the treatment of intrahepatic bile duct stones, and the safety of the program is high.
作者 满忠然
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2017年第24期101-103,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 肝内胆管结石 腹腔镜 治疗 intrahepatic bile duct stones laparoscopy treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献62

  • 1卢榜裕,陆文奇,蔡小勇,黄飞,黄玉斌,林斌,李微筠.腔镜下第一肝门血流阻断器在部分肝切术中的应用[J].生物医学工程与临床,2005,9(2):84-86. 被引量:13
  • 2刘荣,胡明根,赵向前,董家鸿,黄志强.完全腹腔镜肝切除术中顺行胆道镜检查的临床应用[J].中华消化外科杂志,2007,6(1):25-28. 被引量:7
  • 3Lai EC,Ngai TC, Yang GP, et al. Laparoscopic approach of surgical treatment for primary hepatolithiasis:a cohort study[J]. Am J Surg,2010,199(5) :716-721. 被引量:1
  • 4Park JS, Han HS, Hwang DW, et al. Current status of laparoscopic liver resection in Korea[J]. J Korean Med Sci,2012,27(7) :767-771. 被引量:1
  • 5Tsuchiya M, Otsuka Y,Tamura A, et al. Status of endo- scopic liver surgery in Japan:a questionnaire survey con ducted by the Japanese Endoscopic Liver Surgery Study Group[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2009, 16 (4) : 405-409. 被引量:1
  • 6Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, et al. Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institu tion : less is more[J]. Ann Surg, 2007,246 (3) : 385-392. 被引量:1
  • 7Simillis C, Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparo scopic versus open hepatic resections for benign and ma lignant neoplasms : a meta-analysis[J]. Surgery, 2007,141 (2) :203 -211. 被引量:1
  • 8Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection of hepatic neoplasms:comparative a- nalysis of short-term results [J]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22 (10) :2208-2213. 被引量:1
  • 9Buell JF,CherquiD,Geller DA, et al.The international position on la- paroscopic liver surgery:The Louisville Statement,2008 [J]. Ann Surg,2009,22(5):825-830. 被引量:1
  • 10Belli G, Fantini C, D'Agostino A, et al. Laparoseopie left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a safer and faster technique [J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 2006,13.(2): 149-154. 被引量:1

共引文献141

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部