期刊文献+

腹部MDCT与MRCP在肝外胆结石诊断中的对比分析 被引量:3

Comparative Analysis of MDCT and MRCP in the Diagnosis of Extrahepatic Cholelithiasis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比分析腹部MDCT与MRCP成像在肝外胆结石诊断中的价值。方法:以2012年1月到2016年12月为研究时段,选取150例我院收治的肝外胆结石患者作为研究样本,根据抛硬币的方法分为观察组(n=75)和对照组(n=75)。对照组采用腹部螺旋CT进行检查,观察组采用MRCP成像进行检查。而后对比两组患者结石检出率情况。结果:采取不同的检测方法观察组患者结石检出率与对照组比较,差异显著,即P<0.05。结论:对于肝外胆结石MRCP检出率优于腹部螺旋CT,在临床检测中具有极高的使用价值,值得推广。 Objective: To compare the value of abdominal MDCT and MRCP imaging in the diagnosis of extrahepatic gallstones. Methods: From January 2012 to December 2016, 150 patients with extrahepatic gallstones were selected as the study samples. According to the method of throwing coins,the observation group(n=75) and the control group(n=75). The control group was examined by abdominal spiral CT. The observation group was examined by MRCP imaging. And then compare the two groups of patients with stone detection rate. Results: The detection rate of stones in the observation group was significantly different from that of the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: MRCP detection rate of extrahepatic gallstones is better than that of abdominal spiral CT, which is of great value in clinical detection and is worthy of promotion.
出处 《影像技术》 CAS 2017年第6期15-17,共3页 Image Technology
关键词 MDCT MRCP 肝外胆结石 MDCT MRCP Extrahepatic Gallstones
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献22

  • 1Holzapfel K, Eiber M J, Fingerle AA, et al. Konstantin H, Matthias JE,Alexander AF, et al. Detection, classification, and characterization of focal liver lesions: Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging and the combination of both methods. Abdom Imaging, 2012, 37(1): 74-82. 被引量:1
  • 2Kenis C, Deckers F, De Foer B, Van Mieghem F, Van Laere S, Pouillon M. Diagnosis of liver metastases: can diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) be used as a stand alone sequence? Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(5): 1016-1023. 被引量:1
  • 3Schima W, Saini S, Echeverri JA, et al. Focal liver lesions: characterization with conventional spin-echo versus fast spin-echo T2- weighted MR imaging. Radiology. 1997, 202(2): 389-93. 被引量:1
  • 4Choi SA, Lee SS, Jung IH, et al. The effect ofgadoxetic acid enhancement on lesion detection and characterization using T2 weighted imaging and diffusion weighted imaging of the liver. Br J Radiol, 2012, 85(1009): 29-36. 被引量:1
  • 5Kim YK, Lee JM, Kim CS. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced liver MR imaging: value of dynamic and delayed imaging for the characterization and detection of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14(1): 5-13. 被引量:1
  • 6Taouli B, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology, 2010, 254(1): 47-66. 被引量:1
  • 7Kim SY, Lee SS, Byun JH, et al. Malignant hepatic tumors: short- term reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficients with breath-hold and respiratory-triggered diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology, 2010, 255(3): 815-823. 被引量:1
  • 8Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. Focal Liver Lesion Detection and Characterization with Diffusion weighted MR Imaging: Comparison with Standard Breath-hold T2-weighted Imaging. Radiology, 2008, 246(3): 812-822. 被引量:1
  • 9Morana G, Grazioli L, Testoni M, et al. Contrast agents for hepatic magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Resort Imaging, 2002, 13(3): 117-150. 被引量:1
  • 10Kwee TC, Takahara T. Diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting liver metastases: importance of the b-value. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(1): 150. 被引量:1

共引文献32

同被引文献11

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部