期刊文献+

介入相关性心肌梗死与预后的关系

Prognostic Significance of Procedure-related Myocardial Infarction:A Retrospective Study
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)术后发生介入相关性心肌梗死对预后的影响。方法选择行PCI术治疗的患者共360例,根据是否发生介入相关性心肌梗死分为心肌梗死组及非心肌梗死组,观察术后6个月超声心动图较术前相比左心室射血分数变化量(△LVEF)以及随访过程中主要不良心血管事件(the major adverse cardiovascular events,MACE)发生率。结果△LVEF心肌梗死组与非心肌梗死组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.002);MACE发生率心肌梗死组与非心肌梗死组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.004);分层分析示,对于非旋磨患者,介入相关性心肌梗死与△LVEF(P=0.000)及MACE(P=0.004)相关,在旋磨患者中,介入相关性心肌梗死与△LVEF(P=0.857)及MACE(P=0.241)未见同样的相关性。结论介入相关性心肌梗死对于非旋磨的患者发生左心室射血分数下降、MACE发生具有预测价值,在旋磨患者中则并未显示相应的预测性。 Objective To study the prognostic relevance of procedure- related myocardial infarction(PMI) in patients experienced percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Methods A total of 360 patients experienced PCI treatment were divided into myocardial in- farction(MI) group and non- M I group on the basis of occurrence of PMI. The change in left ventricular ejection fraction (A LVEF) 6 months after PCI and the follow -up period major adverse cardiovascular events(MACE) rates were collected. Results There were sta- tistical significant differences between the two groups on A LVEF (P = 0. 002) and occurrence rate of MACE (P = O. 004) ; Stratified a- nalysis showed PMI was related to A LVEF (P = 0. 000) and occurrence rate of MACE (P = 0. 004) in patients without percutaneous cor- onary rotational atherectomy(PTCRA), but in patients experienced PTCRA, PMI didn't show the same relevance to ALVEF (P = 0. 857 ) and MACE (P = 0. 241 ). Conclusion PMI is indicated prognostic value of A LVEF and occurrence rate of MACE in non - PT- CRA patients, and corresponding association is not found in PTCRA parients.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2017年第10期88-92,共5页 Journal of Medical Research
基金 江苏省卫生厅基金资助项目(H201436)
关键词 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 经皮冠状动脉内旋磨术 介入相关性心肌梗死 Percutaneous coronary intervention Percutaneous coronary rotational atherectomy Procedure - related myocardial in- farction
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献104

  • 1姜铁民,张梅,田军,张建起,陈少伯,吴振军,赵鹏,刘军翔,梁国庆,岳继华.药物支架时代冠状动脉旋磨术治疗严重钙化病变63例分析[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(8):46-50. 被引量:3
  • 2韩雅玲,张剑,荆全民,王守力,马颖艳,栾波,李毅.慢性完全闭塞冠状动脉病变1148例患者的介入治疗[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(4):299-302. 被引量:31
  • 3马根山,冯毅,陈忠,沈成兴,罗丹,戴启明.冠状动脉内旋磨术联合支架术治疗严重钙化病变的疗效及随访研究[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2007,15(1):8-10. 被引量:21
  • 4Bertrand ME, Legrand V, Boland J, et al. Randomized multicenter comparison of conventional anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy in unplanned and elective coronary stenting: the Full ANTicoagulation versus Aspirin and TIClopidine study. Circulation, 被引量:1
  • 5Lemos P, Saia F, Hofma SH, et al. Short- and long-term clinical nenefit of sirolimus-eluting stents compared to conventional bare stents for patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004,43:704-708. 被引量:1
  • 6Leon MB, Baim DS, Popma JJ, et al. A clinical trial comparing three antithrombotic-drug regimens after coronary-artery stenting. N Engl J Med, 1998,339:1665-1671. 被引量:1
  • 7Tolleson TR, Newby LK, Harrington RA, et al. Frequency of stent thrombosis after acute coronary syndromes (from the SYMPHONY and 2nd SYMPHONY trials). Am J Cardiol, 2003,92:330-333. 被引量:1
  • 8Cheneau E, Leborgne L, Mintz GS, et al. Predictors of subacute stent thrombosis: results of a systematic intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation, 2003,108:43-47. 被引量:1
  • 9Wang JC, Aucoin-Barry D, Manuelian D, et al. Incidence of aspirin nonresponsiveness using the Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay-ASA. Am J Cardiol, 2003,92:1492-1494. 被引量:1
  • 10Eikelboom JW, Hankey GJ. Failure of aspirin to prevent atherothrombosis: potential mechanisms and implications for clinical practice. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs, 2004,4:57-67. 被引量:1

共引文献97

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部