期刊文献+

艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗老年卒中后抑郁效果对比

Escitalopram versus venlafaxine sustained-release agents in treatment of elderly patients with post-stroke depression
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研讨老年卒中后抑郁患者运用艾司西酞普兰与文拉法辛缓释剂治疗的临床价值。方法依据随机非盲法将80例符合标准的老年卒中后抑郁患者归人两组(各40例)试验,Ⅰ组接受文拉法辛缓释剂治疗,Ⅱ组接受艾司西酞普兰治疗,对比评估两组治疗前后的HAMD评测结果及不良反应发生情况。结果治疗前与治疗后第4、8周末,两组接受HAMD量表评测,结果相比差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但治疗后第1、2周末,Ⅱ组的HAMD评测值相比Ⅰ组显著降低,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组观察期间均有产生不良反应,且Ⅱ组总发生率相对Ⅰ组低,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论艾司西酞普兰、文拉法辛缓释剂均有确切的抗抑郁效果,但前者起效较快、安全性较高,更适合作为临床治疗老年卒中后抑郁的推荐药物。 Objective To study the clinical values of escitalopram and venlafaxine sustained-release agents for elderly patients with post-stroke depression. Methods 80 elderly patients with post-stroke depression were divided into group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ by randomized non-blind method. Group I were treated with venlafaxine sustained-release agents and group Ⅱ with escitalopram. The results of HAMD evaluation and the occurrence of adverse reactions were evaluated before and after the treatment. Results There were no statistical differences in the HAMD scores between the two groups before and 4 and 8 weeks after the treatment (all P〉 0.05). 1 and 2 weeks after the treatment, the HAMD scores were significant lower in group Ⅱ than in group Ⅰ , with statitical differences (all P 〈0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was lower in group Ⅱ than in group Ⅰ (P〈0.05). Conclusion Escitalopram and venlafaxine sustained-release agents both have antidepressant effect, but the former has quicker effect and is safer, so it is more suitable as a recommended drug for the treatment of poststroke depression in the elderly.
作者 李冬华
出处 《国际医药卫生导报》 2017年第21期3397-3399,共3页 International Medicine and Health Guidance News
关键词 卒中 抑郁 艾司西酞普兰 文拉法辛缓释剂 临床价值 Stroke Depression Escitalopram Venlafaxine sustained release agents Clinical value
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献80

共引文献65

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部