期刊文献+

“瞄准器”状皮肤切开缝合法与传统一期缝合法处理肠造口还纳术后腹壁切口的疗效对比 被引量:5

Therapeutic Effect of 'Gunsight' Skin Incision and Closure Technique for Abdominal Wall Incision after Toma Reversal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察"瞄准器"状皮肤切开缝合技术与传统的一期缝合法处理肠造口还纳术后腹壁切口的效果。方法回顾性分析2012年3月至2014年9月间本科室收治的65例肠造口还纳术患者资料,按照造口还纳后腹壁皮肤切口缝合处理的不同,将研究对象分为对照组(n=32)及观察组(n=33),对照组采用传统的一期缝合处理造口还纳后腹壁皮肤切口,观察组采用"瞄准器"状皮肤切开缝合法。比较两组患者的手术时间、手术出血量、切口感染率、住院时间、切口疼痛及治疗满意度。结果两组病人手术均顺利完成。观察组患者伤口感染率及术后疼痛评分均显著低于对照组,治疗满意度评分显著高于对照组(均P<0.05)。两组手术出血量、手术时间、住院时间差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论与传统的一期缝合法相比,"瞄准器"状皮肤切开缝合技术处理腹壁皮肤切口可有效降低肠造口还纳术后的伤口感染率及疼痛感,患者治疗满意度更高。 Objective To compare the clinical effect of ‘Gunsight' skin incision and suture technique with traditional primary suture in the treatment of intestinal colostomy closure after abdominal wall incision. Methods 65 patients of colostomy from March 2012 to September 2014 in our hospital were also retrospectively analzed, the subjects were divided into control group(n = 32) and observation group(n = 33). The patients in the control group were treated with suture technique with traditional primary suture while the observation group with the ‘sight' shaped skin incision suture. The operation time, bleeding volume, incision infection rate, length of stay,incision pain and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results The operation was completed successfully in the two groups. The wound infection rate and postoperative pain score of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group, and the satisfaction score of the treatment group was obviously higher than that of the control group(P 〈 0.05). There were no significant difference in the amount of bleeding, the operation time and the length of stay between the two groups(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional primary suture,the ‘sight' shaped skin incision suture technique for treatment of abdominal wall incision can effectively reduce intestinal colostomy closure after wound infection and pain,which has a higher treatment satisfaction.
作者 陶琦 邓黎 张东平 胡剑飞 刘永安 张小明 Tao Qi Deng Li Zhang Dongping Hu Jianfei Liu Yong'an Zhang Xiaoming.(Department of Colorectal Sugery, The First People's Hospital of Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei, 434000, Chin)
出处 《结直肠肛门外科》 2017年第4期490-494,共5页 Journal of Colorectal & Anal Surgery
关键词 造口还纳 缝合方式 疗效 stomy closure, suture method, surative effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1李德川,钱俊.对肠造口的理解和造口技术的改进[J].结直肠肛门外科,2007,13(4):211-213. 被引量:6
  • 2Hackam DJ,Rotstein OD. Stoma closure and wound infection:an evaluation of risk factors[J].Canadian Journal of Surgery,1995,(02):144-148. 被引量:1
  • 3Garcia-Botello SA,Garcia-Armengol J,Garcia-Granero E. A prospective audit of the complications of loop ileostomy construction and takedown[J].Digestive Surgery,2004,(5-6):440-446. 被引量:1
  • 4Abegg RM,Brokelman W, van Bebber IP, et al. Results of con struction of protective loop ileostomies and reversal surgery for colorectal surgery. Eur Surg Res, 2014,52 : 63-72. 被引量:1
  • 5刘德林,吴昌德,单留群,等.免同纳同肠造口分析.中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2015,9:869-871. 被引量:1
  • 6Sharp SP, Francis JK, Valerian BT, et al. Incidence of ostomy site ineisional hernias after stoma closure. Am Surg, 2015,81 : 1244- 1248. 被引量:1
  • 7Neuman HB, Patil S, Fuzesi S, et al. Impact of a temporary stoma on the quality of life of rectal cancer patients undergoing treat- ment. Ann Surg Oneol, 2011, 18: 1397-1403. DOI: 10. 1245/ s10434-010-1446-9. 被引量:1
  • 8Sajid MS, Bhatti MI, Miles WF. Systematic review and meta-anal- ysis of published rando-mized controlled trials comparing purse- string vs conventional linear closure of the wound following ileos- tomy (stoma) closure. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf), 2015, 3: 156- 161. DOI:10. 1093/gastro/gou038. 被引量:1
  • 9俞宏斌,戴闯,郝立强,孟荣贵,王宗立,钟玲红,朱炜.结肠造口关闭术78例临床分析[J].腹部外科,2008,21(3):161-162. 被引量:4
  • 10李继延.结肠造口还纳术后并发症的分析[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2009,12(6):635-636. 被引量:7

共引文献11

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部