期刊文献+

注意对视听语义整合加工的影响 被引量:1

The Effect of Attention on Audiovisual Speech Integration
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用2×3的被试内实验设计,将注意条件和目标刺激类型作为实验变量,考察了指向不同感觉通道的注意对视听语义整合加工的不同影响。结果发现,只有在同时注意视觉和听觉刺激时,被试对语义一致的视听刺激反应最快,即产生冗余信号效应。而在选择性注意一个感觉通道时,语义一致的视听刺激并不具有加工优势。进一步分析发现,在同时注意视觉和听觉时语义一致视听刺激的加工优势源自于其视觉和听觉成分产生了整合。也就是说,只有在同时注意视觉和听觉时,语义一致视听刺激才会产生整合,语义不一致视听刺激不会产生整合。而在选择性注意一个感觉通道时,不论语义是否一致,视听刺激均不会产生整合。 The present research used the square and the triangle as visual stimuli and spoken words as auditory stimuli to investigate the effect of attention on multisensory speech integration. The visual and auditory stimuli were semantically congruent or incongruent. The results from a discrimination task showed that: 1) In the condition of divided attention, participants required less time to react to audiovisual semantic-congruent targets than other types of targets; that is the redundant signal effect; 2) According to the race model, the redundant signal effect in the condition of divided attention originated from the multisensory integration. To conclude, the multisensory integration occurred when the attention was divided between visual and auditory modatity only in the semantic- congruent audiovisual stimuli.
作者 吕勇 顾吉有
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第5期587-592,共6页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 基金项目:天津市高等学校"心理健康与行为调控创新团队(39)"
关键词 注意 多感觉整合 语义联结 竞争模型 attention, multisensory integration, semantic congruence, race model.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1Calvert, G. A., & Thesen, T. (2004). Multisensory integration: Methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. Journal of Physiology, 98, 191-205. 被引量:1
  • 2Foxe, J. J., Morocz, I. ,~., Murray,M. M., Higgins, B. A., Javitt, D. C., & Schroeder, C. E. (2000). Multisensory auditory-somatosensory interactions in early cortical processing revealed by high-density electrical mapping. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 77-83. 被引量:1
  • 3Frassinetti, F., Bolognini, N., & L~davas, E. (2002). Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Experimental Brain Research, 147(3), 332-343. 被引量:1
  • 4Frens, M. A., Van Opstal, A. J., & Van der Willigen, R. F. (1995). Spatial and temporal factors determine auditory- visual interactions in human saccadic eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 57(6), 802-816. 被引量:1
  • 5Giard, M. H., & Peronnet, F. (1999). Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: A behavioral and electrophysiological study. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 11(5), 473-490. 被引量:1
  • 6Giray,VM., & Ulrich, R. (1993i. Motor coactivation revealed by response force, in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology." Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1278-1291. 被引量:1
  • 7Macaluso, E. (2006). Multisensory processing in sensory- specific cortical areas. The Neuroscientist, 12, 327-338. 被引量:1
  • 8Macaluso, E., & Driver, J. (2005). Multisensory spatial interactions: A window onto functional integration in the human brain. Trends in Neuroseiences, 28 (5), 264-271. 被引量:1
  • 9Mannuzza, S., Kietzman, M. L., Berenhaus, I. J., Ramsey, P. H., Zubin, J., & Sutton, S. (1984). The modality shift effect in schizophrenia: Fact or artifact? Biological Psychiatry, 19, 1317-1331. 被引量:1
  • 10Miller, J. (1982). Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 247-279. 被引量:1

共引文献5

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部