摘要
德、日民事法中关于不法原因给付的处理规则可能产生"不法即合法"的结果。我国现行民法中并无不法原因给付的规定,对不法原因给付物的处理机制是通过《民法通则》和《合同法》的相关规定来处理的,该处理机制存在"不法却被保护"的问题。直接引进德、日不法原因给付立法制度将与我国整个法律体系不相协调,容易导致司法实践中出现问题,因而有必要扬长补短,探求与我国法律体系相协调的不法原因给付处理制度。在明确了不法原因给付物的所有权归属之后,进而探讨侵占不法原因给付(委托)物是否构成侵占罪。
The process rules in German and Japan civil law on unlawful cause payment may give rise to the problem of'lawful illegality'. China's current civil law is not concerned with unlawful cause payment, which is handled according to General Rules of the Civil Law and ContractLaw, whose processing mechanism suffers from the problems of'protected illegality'. The direct introduction of German and Japan legislation does not agree with the legal system of our country, and will easily cause problems in judicial practice. Therefore it is necessary to explore unlawful cause payment processing mechanism in accordance with our legal system. After defining the ownership of the unlawful cause payment, and this paper discusses whether the occupation of unlawful cause payment objects constitutes the crime of embezzlement.
出处
《汕头大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
2017年第10期38-45,共8页
Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
海南三亚市法学会2017年度研究课题"侵占不法原因给付物的刑民问题研究"(SYFX2017-05)
关键词
不法原因给付
给付
委托
侵占罪
unlawful cause payment
payment
commission
the crime of embezzlement
