摘要
我国立法上采取民商合一模式,决议行为纳入到法律行为类型中,但在决议行为的具体定性上有意思形成说、共同行为说、特殊单方行为说和独立法律行为等几种学说,对决议行为性质不同的理解造成了决议效力的认定的窘境。我国宜根据有无相对方将决议行为分为单方或多方法律行为,审慎认定决议效力,在个别股东意思表示瑕疵下的决议效力可认定为未形成有效决议或可撤销的情形,建议在未来加入相关性条款,以求弥补法律漏洞。
China＇s legislation to adopt a civil and commercial model, the resolution into the types of legal acts, but in the specific character of the resolution of the specific formation of said that the common behavior that special unilateral behavior and independent legal acts and other theories , The understanding of the nature of the resolution of the resolution of the resolution of the determination of the dilemma. China should be based on whether there is no relative to the resolution of the resolution is divided into unilateral or multi -party legal acts, prudently determined the effectiveness of the resolution, the individual shareholders mean that the resolution of the resolution can be identified as the formation of a valid resolution or revocation of the situation, Relevant terms, in order to make up for legal loopholes.
出处
《广西政法管理干部学院学报》
2017年第5期47-51,共5页
Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词
法律行为
意思瑕疵
决议性质
决议效力
legal action
Meaning flaws
Resolution nature
Resolution effect
