期刊文献+

明末清初相反对立的阳明学派史--周汝登《圣学宗传》与黄宗羲《明儒学案》的比较 被引量:1

On the Conflicting Views about the History of Wang Yang-ming School in Late Ming Dynasty and Early Qing Dynasty:Comparison Between Sheng-Xue-Zong-Zhuan and Ming-Ru-Xue-An
下载PDF
导出
摘要 回顾近代以后的阳明学研究史可以看到,阳明学派的研究一般以黄宗羲《明儒学案》为出发点,以尊重有善有恶说的修证派为阳明学的正统,以尊重无善无恶说的左派为异端。但是,如果根据周汝登《圣学宗传》可以看出,明末的状况是在阳明学派中,左派是主流,修证派是相似朱子学的保守派。《圣学宗传》代表明末万历末年的阳明学观,《明儒学案》代表清初康熙间阳明学观,二者都应该被尊重。 When we look back on the history of the study of Wang Yang-ming school after modern times;the starting point of the study on Wang Yang-ming school is Huang Zong-xi's 'Ming-Ru-Xue-An',a large number of scholars assume Yang-ming school's scholars who put emphasis on ascetic practice and respect the doctrine of 'You-Shan You-E' to be the orthodox Yang-ming school,the radical scholars who respect the doctrine of 'Wu-Shan Wu-E' to be the heretical school.However,if it depends on Zhou Rudeng's 'Sheng-Xue-Zong-Zhuan',in the situation of the late Ming period,we can consider the radical school as the mainstream,the conservatives look like the Zhu-xi school, 'Sheng-Xue-Zong-Zhuan' represents the view on Wang Yang-ming school in the Wan-li period of late Ming Dynasty, 'Ming-Ru-Xue-An' represent the view on Wang Yang-ming school in the Kang-xi period of the early Qing Dynasty,both views should be respected.
出处 《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2017年第1期12-18,共7页 Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
关键词 阳明学 周汝登 圣学宗传 黄宗羲 明儒学案 Yangmingism Zhou Rudeng Holy learning religion Huang Zongxi Records of Mingscholars
  • 相关文献

同被引文献111

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部