摘要
目的:对比耳背刺络放血法和穴位敷贴在治疗肺气不足型喉痹中的临床疗效。方法:选择本院2016年3-12月收集肺气不足型喉痹患者122例,随机分为A、B两组,各61例,A组给予耳背刺络放血法治疗,B组给予穴位敷贴治疗,观察治疗效果及不良反应发生情况,对比治疗前、后症状积分,记录两组患者治疗费用。结果:治疗前,两组患者症状积分相近,治疗后两组均未见明显不良反应,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,B组疗效高于A组,症状积分、治疗费用均低于A组,差异显著,存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在肺气不足型喉痹治疗中,与耳背刺络放血法相比,穴位敷贴可更为快速、有效地缓解患者症状及体征,促使患者尽早痊愈,减轻患者的经济负担,值得临床推广应用。
Objective:To compare the clinical effect between ear pricking bloodletting and acupoint application in the treatment of lung qi deficiency in houbi.Methods:In our hospital from March 2016 to December 2016 were collected in122 cases of lung deficiency type houbi,were randomly divided into A,B two groups,61 cases each,A group was given ear therapeutics of bloodletting therapy,B group received acupoint sticking therapy,observe the curative effect and adverse reaction incidence,compared before and after treatment of symptoms.Record two groups of patients with treatment costs.Results:Before treatment,two groups of patients with similar symptoms after treatment,the two groups were no obvious adverse reactions,there were no statistical significance(P>0.05);after treatment,the curative effect of group B was higher than that of A group,symptoms,treatment costs were lower than the A group,significant difference,statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:In the treatment of lung deficiency type houbi,compared with the ear bloodletting,acupoint application can more quickly and effectively relieve the symptoms and signs of patients,promote patients early recovery,reduce the economic burden of the patients,which is worthy of clinical application.
出处
《医学理论与实践》
2017年第19期2833-2835,共3页
The Journal of Medical Theory and Practice
关键词
耳背刺络放血法
穴位敷贴
肺气不足型喉痹
Ear pricking bloodletting
Acupoint application
Lung qi deficiency type pharyngitis
