期刊文献+

大型铁矿高压辊磨与常规碎磨方案比较 被引量:5

Comparison Between HPGR Scheme and Conventional Crushing & Grinding Scheme for Large-scale Iron Ore Mine
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,采用高压辊磨工艺处理低品位单一磁铁矿应用较为广泛,高压辊磨方案与常规磨矿方案相比,具有多碎少磨、碎矿能耗低、降低磨矿功耗、提前粗粒抛尾、减少入磨量、能提高后续磨机处理能力等优点。在相同条件下对两种方案从技术和经济上进行比较,计算了两种方案的耗材、耗电、经营费及投资费用,这对类似矿山在方案选择上有很强的参考意义。 In recent years, high pressure grinding roller (HPGR) process is widely applied to process low grade monotonous magnetite. Compared with conventional grinding scheme, HPGR scheme is characterized by crushing more and grinding less, low energy consumption for ore crushing, decreased energy consumption for ore grinding, coarse particle tailings discarding in advance, reduction in amount of ores that need grinding and improvement on processing capacity of subsequent mills. Under the same conditions, the two schemes are compared from economic and technical aspects. Consumables, energy consumption, operating cost and investment cosf for the two schemes are calculated, which is very referential to scheme selection for similar mines.
出处 《矿业工程》 CAS 2017年第5期38-42,共5页 Mining Engineering
关键词 高压辊磨 常规碎磨 铁矿 投资 HPGR conventional crushing & grinding iron ore investment
  • 相关文献

同被引文献47

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部