摘要
2012年修改的《刑事诉讼法》增加了"排除合理怀疑"的规定,作为证明标准中"事实清楚,证据确实、充分"的说明。文章阐述"排除合理怀疑"在英美法系中的适用情况,探讨合理怀疑的概念和适用规则,结合中国的刑事司法制度和相关规定,分析了"排除合理怀疑"与刑事诉讼其他证明标准之间的关系,提出我国刑事诉讼不同阶段的证明标准应当存在不同层次性的观点。同时,文章还试图分析现行审判模式下的证明标准,以及审判工作中在适用"排除合理怀疑"证明标准时可能遇到的问题。
The Criminal Procedure Law of China,revised in 2012,added the provision of＂beyond reasonable doubt＂as a description of ＂the clear facts and clear and sufficient evidence＂in the standard of proof provision. This article studies the concept of ＂beyond reasonable doubt ＂ in the Anglo-American criminal justice,discusses the necessities of adopting it in China＇s criminal procedural law,exploring the circumstances of using this standard in trial,and explains the relation between＂beyond reasonable doubt＂and the other relevant provisions,inter alia,the requirements of proof in activities of investigation and prosecution. The author points out that there should be the different levels of proof standards in different stages of the crimi-nal process. Finally,the author explains the questions concerning ＂beyond reasonable doubt＂in China＇s judicial practice.
出处
《浙江工商大学学报》
CSSCI
2017年第5期6-14,共9页
Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金
最高人民检察院2017年检察理论研究课题"起诉标准与定罪标准关系研究"(GJ2017D22)
关键词
排除合理怀疑
中国特色
证明标准
beyond reasonable doubt
China criminal justice
standard of proof
