摘要
随着20世纪80年代美国科研不端行为的激增,无私利性规范能否构成独立的存在而不被替代,成为朱克曼和施茅斯争论的主题。第一,社会规范不能取代科学规范,科学规范体现求真的建制性目标,这是无私利性规范的独特特征。第二,技术规范不能取代科学规范,二者不能混同,无意识地违反技术规范,不等同于违反科学规范,它不属于科研不端行为;整篇论文剽窃违反无私利性规范,属于科研不端行为。第三,诚实性原则不能替换无私利性规范,无私利性规范保证了科学领域更高的诚实性要求,比如列出不利于自己的反方观点和证据等等。
Along with the sharp increase of American scientific misconduct in 1980s, there is a debate between Zuckerman and Schmaus about whether disinterested norm is an independent existence. Firstly, social norm could not substitute for scientific norm, owing to disinterested norms relate to the institution target for truth. Secondly, technological norms couldn＇ t take the place of scientific norms, because unconscious violation of technological norms is not equal to violation of scientific norms,which doesn＇t belong to scientific misconduct, meanwhile, plagiarize of whole scientific paper belong to scientific misconduct, instead of violation of technological norm. Thirdly, honesty principle couldn＇t substitute for disinterested norm, for the disinterested norms＇ higher honesty standard, for instance, listing all opposite ideas and proofs.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第10期50-55,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
