摘要
司法场域中法官谨慎言行义务边界的合理划定与司法公信力的维系密切相关。从国际性条约和主要法治国家的相关规定来看,司法场域中法官谨慎言行义务集合中的可具化元素包括对未决或者即将发生案件评论限制义务和禁止单方面交流义务。从理论上看,对未决或者即将发生案件评论限制义务边界由时间限度、范围限度、内容限制三要素划定,禁止单方面交流义务边界则由规制主体、客体和例外性规定三要素廓清。我国对未决或者即将发生案件评论限制义务的立法存在时间限制规定不明确、案件范围限制存在立法疏漏等不足,有必要将对未决或者即将发生案件评论的时间限度设定在案件判决产生既判力之前,同时将法官对自己正在审理案件加以评论的行为纳入法律规制的范畴。我国禁止单方面交流义务边界的划定存在单边性信息携带者法定范围过窄、非联络性单方面交流行为缺乏规制等不足,有必要使用拓宽单边性信息携带者的范围、规制非联络性单方面交流行为等方式予以纠正。
The boundary of judge's caution obligation in judicial filed is closely related to the maintenance of the judicial public trust.From the international treaties and the relevant provisions of the major countries ruled by law,judge's caution obligation in judicial spheres includes the review of the pending or upcoming cases,and the limitation of obligations and the prohibition of unilateral exchange of obligations. The boundary delimitation that comment on pending or upcoming cases drawn mainly from the time limit,the scope limit,and content restriction,banning unilateral communication obligations entered the border from the subject,object,and exception provision. The legislation of obligation that limited comment on pending or upcoming cases in our country have many deficiencies including indeterminacy of time limited,legislation omissions of case scope limitation and so on,so it is necessary to set the time limit in the case before being sentenced to force,at the same time,it is necessary to restrict judge comments themselves cases which he is trying to hear. The boundary delimitation of banned unilateral exchange in our country exists some deficiencies,including unilateral information carriers legal scope is too narrow,no regulation on non-contact of unilateral communication behavior,so it is necessary to broaden the unilateral information carriers,regulate the non contact unilateral communication behavior.
出处
《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期99-102,共4页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
关键词
法官
谨慎言行义务
司法场域
judge
caution obligation
judicial spheres
