摘要
在过去的四分之一个世纪中,中国与印度已经成为全球总量最大、增长最快的经济体,"龙象之争"也逐渐成为学界与业界讨论的热点。"印度能否超越中国"的疑惑萦绕于国人心中挥之不去。作者认为回答这一问题,首先应了解两国过往增长的本质。众所周知,中国崛起依靠的是制造业的成功及其带来的全面工业化,印度崛起则依靠的是软件设计及服务业的快速发展。但为何两国优势产业截然不同?本文作者从一系列"中层制度"入手,认为两国在产业结构上的差异源自各国的比较制度优势不同。作者认为,中印两国不同的中层制度,决定了企业获取土地、资本、劳工以及技术这四个最基本要素的不同特征,影响了政府与企业的决策,从而塑造出两国不同的产业结构。
In the past two decades, China and India have been the fastest growing economies in the world, which sparks off the debate over ＂Can India Overtake China？＂ To better answer this question, the sector that plays the key role in driving economic growth is first specified： it is manufacturing sector in China while service sector in India, and, in the IT industry, hardware in China while software in India. What makes the differences in the industrial structures in the two economic giants？ After examining the meso-level institutional arrangements related to the key factors of production, such as land, capital, labor, and technology, the institutional sources of the divergent industrial structures is discovered. When facing different institutional setups, economic agents like entrepreneurs and enterprises tend to maximize their interests and thus formulate different strategies, which, in the end, bring about divergent industrial structures.
出处
《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第5期35-48,共14页
Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金
华东理工大学基本科研业务费探索研究基金"中印制度环境与产业发展模式比较"(WE1621001)
关键词
比较制度优势
资本主义多样性
中国
印度
comparative institutional advantage~ varieties of capitalism~ China~ India
