摘要
学界对司马光哲学思想的归属问题认识不一,既看到了他与理学之间的亲密关系,又囿于南宋以来的道统意识,不愿接受其在理学发展史上的宗师地位。实则司马光不仅与理学中人多有交往,主动参与北宋理学诸子的学术圈子,共同促成了理学初兴时期元气淋漓的发展局面;而且后世学人在题写有关司马光之书画作品时,对其学术品格与道学气象也十分推崇。但在程朱后学争胜门户、指认谱系的过程中,司马光逐渐被隔离道统,其理学宗师的身份也随之被消释掉了。
Academia have different understanding of SimaGuang＇ s philosophical thought, although recognized his close rela- tionship with Neo - Confucianism, but unwilling to accept his of Confucian As a matter of fact, SimaGuang not only had a lot of contacts with Neo - Confucians, and active participation in their academic circle, which con- tributed to the booming development of Neo - Confucianism in the beginning period. And later scholars have a very high regard for his academic character and Confucianism, when theywrote thepestscript on SimaGuang＇ srelevantcalligraphy and paintings. Unfortunate- ly, due toparoohial prejudice, SimaGuangwas graduallyseparated from Confucian orthodoxy bythe laterCheng- Zhu school. His mas- teridentity of Noo - Confucianismalso had been dispelled.
出处
《北方论丛》
北大核心
2017年第5期99-104,共6页
The Northern Forum
基金
山西省哲学社会科学规划课题"司马光廉政思想与理学文化关系研究"(2015054008)
关键词
司马光
理学
道统
SimaGuang
Neo - Confucianism
Confucian orthodoxy
