摘要
目的:探讨跟骨骨折微创治疗的临床价值。方法:收集笔者所在医院跟骨骨折的患者120例,分为研究组(接受撬拨复位联合切开复位跟骨微型异形钛板内固定术)和对照组(接受传统手术切开复位)。对比两组手术相关指标、Maryland评分、术后皮瓣愈合不良及坏死率、术后感染率、手术疗效和住院时间。结果:研究组术中出血量少于对照组,术后Maryland足部功能评分优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组手术后皮瓣愈合不良及坏死率、术后感染率及住院时间少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组手术疗效明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:跟骨骨折发生后,接受撬拨复位联合切开复位跟骨微型异形钛板内固定术疗效优于切开复位。
Objective：To explore the clinical value of minimally invasive treatment of calcaneal fracture.Method：120 patients with calcaneal fractures were collected,and divided into the research group（the prying reset combined open reduction with bone micro profiled titanium plate fixation） and the control group（traditional surgery ORIF）.Two groups of surgical indicators,Maryland score,postoperative skin flap healing and necrosis rate,postoperative infection rate,surgical efficacy,and hospitalization time were compared.Result：Compared with the control group,the blood loss volume and function score of the postoperative Maryland foot was superior in the research group（P〈0.05）.After the operation of the group,there were differences in skin flap healing and necrosis rate,postoperative infection rate and hospitalization time in two groups（P〈0.05）.The result of the effect in the research group was significantly higher than that in the control group（P〈0.05）.Conclusion：After the fracture of the bone fracture,the curative effect of the prying reset combined open reduction with bone micro profiled titanium plate fixation is better than that of open reduction.
出处
《中外医学研究》
2017年第26期12-13,共2页
CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
