期刊文献+

买赠还是折扣?不同价格水平条件下时间距离对促销方式框架效应的影响 被引量:1

Buying Gift or Price Discount: Influence of Temporal Distance on Sales Promotion Framing Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 买赠和折扣是价格促销中最为常见的两种方式,那么如果促销价值完全相等,哪种促销方式框架对消费者更具吸引力?现在做出判断和远期将来进行判断的结果是否不同?通过三个研究考察了不同价格水平下时间距离对促销方式框架感知价值的影响。结果发现:(1)在高、低价格水平条件下,存在促销方式框架效应,而在中等价格水平条件下,不存在促销方式框架效应。(2)对于高价商品,消费者在近期更偏好买赠框架,远期更偏好折扣框架;而对低价商品,消费者在近期更偏好折扣框架,远期更偏好买赠框架。结果表明,消费者对促销方式框架的偏好受到价格水平和时间距离的影响。 Buying gifts and discount are two most common forms of price promotion. If the promotional value is exactly the same,what kind of promotional framework is more attractive to consumers? Is it different to make a judgment now and to judge in the long run? The influence of time distance on the perceived value of sales promotion framework under different price levels is investigated through three studies. The results show that promotion mode framing effects exist at high and low price levels while such effects do not exist at middle price level; and that for high-price goods,consumers prefer buying gift frames in the near future and prefer discount frames in the far future while for low-price goods,consumers prefer discount frames in the near future and prefer buying gift frames in the far future. All these findings indicate that consumers' preference for promotion mode framework is influenced by price level and time distance.
作者 刘宁 孙丽
出处 《山东财经大学学报》 2017年第4期21-31,共11页 Journal of Shandong University of Finance and Economics
基金 山东省应用基础型名校工程建设项目 山东师范大学青年教师科研项目"买赠促销框架对消费者决策的影响--消费心理学的视角"(13SQR014) 山东师范大学人类认知与学习重点实验室建设项目
关键词 价格促销 框架效应 解释水平 时间距离 折扣框架 买赠框架 price sales promotion framing effect construal level temporal distance price-discount frame buying-gift frame
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献116

  • 1韩睿,田志龙.促销类型对消费者感知及行为意向影响的研究[J].管理科学,2005,18(2):85-91. 被引量:93
  • 2张黎.价格促销对商店整体价格形象的影响:理论与实证研究回顾[J].商业经济与管理,2006(5):25-31. 被引量:6
  • 3唐小飞,周庭锐,陈淑青.价格促销与D&B忠诚模式关联实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(10):121-128. 被引量:16
  • 4Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal. Psychological Science, 19(2), 161-167. 被引量:1
  • 5Armor, D. A., & Sackett, A. M. (2006). Accuracy, error, and bias in predictions for real versus hypothetical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (4), 583-600. 被引量:1
  • 6Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609-622. 被引量:1
  • 7Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4), 610-622. 被引量:1
  • 8Bilgin, B., & Brenner, L. (2008). Temporal distance moderates description dependence of subjective probability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(3), 890-895. 被引量:1
  • 9Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2004). Temporal distance, event representation, and similarity. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL. 被引量:1
  • 10Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2006). Representation across time: Generalizing temporal effects on perceived similarity. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada. 被引量:1

共引文献278

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部