期刊文献+

锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折中颈干角变化及其临床意义 被引量:11

Radiographical research and clinical significance of neck shaft angle change in locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折时颈干角变化及其临床意义。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究分析2008年1月一2016年6月应用锁定钢板治疗的214例肱骨近端骨折患者临床资料。根据有无内侧骨缺损将患者分为两组:伴内侧骨缺损组85例,其中男35例,女50例;平均年龄63.3岁。其中Neer分型三部分骨折47例,四部分骨折38例。不伴内侧骨缺损组129例,其中男51例,女78例;平均年龄65.9岁。其中Neer分型三部分骨折57例,四部分骨折72例。比较术前对侧、术后1d、1,3,6,12个月x线片肱骨颈干角变化,采用Constant评分评价肩关节功能。结果214例患者术后获随访12~42个月,平均24.2个月。伴内侧骨缺损组术前对侧、术后1d,术后1,3,6,12个月颈干角分别为(133.4±4.0)°、(134.7±11.5)°、(120.8±4.0)°、(118.5±3.5)°、(117.9±10.4)°、(114.7±4.4)°;不伴内侧骨缺损组分别为(134.0±2.4)°、(133.8±17.1)°、(135.6±2.9)°、(132.7±2.8)°、(131.5±13.5)°、(135.2±2.8)°。两组术后1,3,6,12个月的颈干角比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05),伴内侧骨缺损组术前与术后1d颈干角差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但两者均大于其余各时相点(P〈0.05);而不伴内侧骨缺损组中,除术后1个月与术后6个月的颈干角之间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)外,其余各时相点比较差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。伴内侧骨缺损组和不伴内侧骨缺损组Constant评分分别为(69.3±14.6)分、(75.2±12.6)分(P〈0.05)。结论正常颈干角恢复后仍需注意术后颈干角的丢失。肱骨颈干角可以为术前手术方案及术后功能锻炼计划的制订提供依据,指导术中解剖复位以及评估术后疗效。此外,颈干角的丢失受到内侧支撑的影响,并进� Objective To investigate the changes and clinical significance of neck-shaft angle in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plate. Methods A retrospective case-control study was done on 214 cases of proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plate in our hospital from January 2008 to June 2016. According to the presence of medial bone defects, the cases were divided into medial bone defect group (85 cases) and non-medial bone defect group (129 cases). In medial bone defect group, there were 35 males and 50 females, with an average age of 63.3 years old. In this group, the cases of Neer three-part fractures and Neer four-part fractures were 47 and 38, respectively. In non- medial bone defect group, there were 51 males and 78 females, with an average age of 65.9 years old. In this group, the cases of Neer three-part fractures and Neer four-part fractures were 57 and 72, respectively.The preoperative humeral neck-shaft angle of contralateral humerus, and the humeral neck-shaft angle with its changes on the second postoperative day as well as 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery were evaluated by the X-ray film. The Constant scores of the shoulder function were also assessed. Results The follow-up time for the patients ranged from 12 to 42 months (mean 24.2 months). In medial bone defect group, the preoperative neck-shaft angle of contralateral humerus, as well as neck-shaft angles of fractured side at five follow-up visits were ( 133.4±4.0)°, ( 134.7±11.5 )°, ( 120.8 ±4.0)°, ( 118.5±3.5 )°, ( 117.9±10.4)° and ( 114.7±4.4)°, respectively. While in the other group, the corresponding parameters were (134.0±2.4)°, (133.8±17. 1)°, (135.6± 2.9)°, (132.7± 2.8 )°, ( 131.5±13.5 )°, ( 135.2±2.8 )°, respectively. There were significant differences between the two groups of the neck-shaft angle at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months(P 〈0.05) . In the medial bone defect group, there were no significant differences between neck-shaf
出处 《中华创伤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第9期823-828,共6页 Chinese Journal of Trauma
基金 温州市科技局科技计划项目(Y20130195)
关键词 肱骨骨折 骨折内固定 肱骨颈干角 Humeral fractures Fracture fixation, internal Neck-shaft angle
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献106

  • 1钟世镇.数字化虚拟中国人研究动态[J].医学研究通讯,2004,33(6):5-6. 被引量:5
  • 2Lill H, Hepp P, Komer J, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: how stiff should an implant be? A comparative mechanical study with new implants in human specimens. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2003, 123:74-81. 被引量:1
  • 3Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU, et al. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma,2007,21 : 185-191. 被引量:1
  • 4Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER, et al. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaverlc and synthetic humeri. J Orthop Trauma, 2006,20: 547-554. 被引量:1
  • 5Friess DM, Atria A. Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures : a comparison with other fixation techniques. Orthopedics, 2008,31:1183-1190. 被引量:1
  • 6Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008,90:233-240. 被引量:1
  • 7Kannus P,Palvanen M,Niemi S,et al.Rate of proximal humeral fractues in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007.Bone.20(9,44(4):656-659. 被引量:1
  • 8Bell JE,Leung BC,Spratt KF,et al.Trends and variation in incidence,surgical treatment,and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),2011,93(2):121-131. 被引量:1
  • 9Sproul RC,lyengar JJ,Deveic Z,et al.A svstematie review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fiactures.Injury,2010,42(4):408-413. 被引量:1
  • 10Clavert P,Adam P,Bevort A,et al.Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture.J Should Elbow Surg,2010,19(4):489-494. 被引量:1

共引文献191

同被引文献100

引证文献11

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部