期刊文献+

中国“双层模式”环境产品清单的法律分析——以《环境产品协定》谈判为背景

A Legal Analysis of China's “Double Mode” of Environmental Goods List——On the background of the negociation of Environmental Goods Agreement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 WTO框架下各成员国就环境产品以清单方式进行谈判,中国提出的由"共同清单"和"发展清单"组成的"双层模式"清单,平衡了发达国家与发展中国家的利益,从法理上分析,符合共同但有区别的原则、GATT1994规则和WTO基本原则。基于"双层模式"清单的优势,完善中国环境产品清单的法律规制,扩大环境产品清单的适用范围,形成科学的动态清单,有利于实现环境与贸易的双赢。 Given that the member countries negotiate environmental goods on a list under the WTO framework,China has proposed a 'double mode'of environmental goods list,consisting of the 'common list'and the 'development list'to balance the interests of both the developed and the developing countries. From the legal analysis it conforms to the common but differentiated principle,namely the rules of GATT 1994 and the basic principles of WTO. Based on the advantages of the 'double mode'list,the win-win situation of environment and trade can be achieved by perfecting the legal regulation of China's environmental goods list,expanding the application scope of environmental products list,and forming a scientific dynamic list.
作者 赵希伟
机构地区 南开大学法学院
出处 《西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2017年第4期62-67,共6页 Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 环境产品清单 共同清单 发展清单 合法性 environmental goods list common list development list legality
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献56

  • 1杨兴.试论国际环境法的共同但有区别的责任原则[J].时代法学,2003,1(1):83-93. 被引量:26
  • 2边永民.积极应对多哈回合环境货物谈判[J].WTO经济导刊,2006(5):45-47. 被引量:8
  • 3Anita Margrethe Halvorssen, Equality Among Unequals in International Environmental Law. Boulder, Westview Press,1999. 被引量:1
  • 4See Christopher D. Stone, Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law. American Journal of International Law, vol. 98, pp. 276 -301 . 被引量:1
  • 5Paul G. Harris, Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: The Kyoto Protocol and United States Policy. New York University Environmental Law Journal, vol. 7, pp. 27 -40. 被引量:1
  • 6Rumu Sarkar, Critical Essay: Theoretical Foundations in Development Law: A Reconciliation of Opposites? Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, vol. 33, summer 2005, pp. 367 - 378. 被引量:1
  • 7See Declaration of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, UN Doc. A/Conf. 151/5/Rev. 1,13 June 1992. 被引量:1
  • 8See Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, UN Doc. A/Conf. 48/14, 16 June 1972. 被引量:1
  • 9See P.G. Harris, Common but Differentiated Responsibility: The Kyoto Protocol and United States Policy. New York University Envirenmental Law Journal, vol. 7, 1999, p. 27. 被引量:1
  • 10See Article 5, the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1987. 被引量:1

共引文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部