期刊文献+

考虑碳排放容忍度的多级供应链生产-库存系统碳税博弈策略 被引量:7

The carbon tax game strategy for multi-level supply chain production inventory system considering the tolerance of carbon emissions
原文传递
导出
摘要 为解决多级供应链不同主体间应对碳限制与碳税机制问题,基于Stackelberg博弈理论研究了由单制造商、多分销商和多零售商构成的多级供应链生产-库存系统碳税博弈策略.针对政府对于企业超标准排放的容忍程度,设定了级差等级碳税,并据此建立了多级供应链生产-库存系统策略集合;对比级差碳税与统一碳税下四种博弈策略的成本及碳排放水平变化,给出了制造商和零售商主导下的非合作博弈模型以及供应链成员间合作博弈模型,并进行了分析.数值算例验证了模型和算法的有效性. In order to solve the problems of carbon limitation and carbon tax mechanism on the multi-level supply chain between different departments, the model in the paper, which consists of one manufacturer, multi-distributor and multi-retaileL was built based on Stackelberg game theory. Because of the tolerance of carbon over-emissions from the enterprises, the paper studied the differential policies which contain carbon tax and the production-inventory systems. Comparing different environment about differential carbon tax and harmonized carbon tax, the paper presents and analyzes four game strategies about cost and carbon emission levels, and the non-cooperative game model under the guidance of the manufacturer and the retailer, and the cooperative game model between departments of the supply chain. The effectiveness of the model and algorithm were testified through the numerical example.
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2017年第8期2071-2082,共12页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71572031) 辽宁省哲学社会科学规划基金项目(L16AZY032)~~
关键词 碳排放容忍度 级差碳税 统一碳税 合作与非合作博弈模型 carbon emissions tolerance differential carbon tax uniform carbon tax cooperative and non-cooperative game model
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献67

  • 1国务院发展研究中心课题组.中国经济增长的前景分析[J].决策与信息,2005(8):4-4. 被引量:9
  • 2李继峰,张阿玲.混合式能源-经济-环境系统模型构建方法论[J].系统工程学报,2007,22(2):170-175. 被引量:14
  • 3Weitzman M L. Prices vs. Quantities[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1974, 41(4) : 477 -491. 被引量:1
  • 4Metcalf E G. Designing a carbon tax to reduce U.S. greenhouse gas emissions [ J ]. Review of Enviromental Economics and Policy, 2009, 3 ( 1 ) : 63 - 83. 被引量:1
  • 5Avi-Yonah S R, Uhlmann D M. Combating global climate change: Why a carbon tax is a better response to global warming than cap and trade[J]. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 2009, 28(3) : 3 -50. 被引量:1
  • 6Wittneben B F. Exxon is right: Let us re-examine our choice for a cap-and-trade system over a carbon tax[J], Energy Poli- cy, 2009, 37 (6) : 2462 - 2464. 被引量:1
  • 7Mann F R. The case for the carbon tax: How to overcome politics and find our green destiny [ J ]. Environmental Law Report- er, 2009, 39(2) : 10118 - 10126. 被引量:1
  • 8Stavins R N, Addressing climate change with a comprehensive US cap-and-trade system [ J ]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2008, 24(2) : 298 -321. 被引量:1
  • 9Murray B C, Richard G N, William A P. Balancing cost and emissions certainty: An allowance reserve for cap-and-trade [ J]. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2009, 3 ( 1 ) : 84 - 103. 被引量:1
  • 10Keohane N O. Cap-and-trade, rehabilitated: Using tradable permits to control U.S. greenhouse gases[ J]. Review of Envi- ronmental Economics and Policy, 2009, 3 ( 1 ) : 42 - 62. 被引量:1

共引文献328

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部