摘要
经典JACBART微表情识别测验只考察平静表情背景下微表情识别,生态效度不高。本研究创建生态化微表情识别测验,考察所有7种基本表情背景下的6种微表情识别特征。结果发现:(1)该测验具有良好的重测信度、校标效度和生态效度,能够稳定有效地测量生态化微表情识别。(2)信效度检验揭示了生态化微表情识别特征。某些生态化微表情识别存在训练效应。生态化微表情与经典微表情或普通表情普遍相关。恐惧、悲伤、厌恶、愤怒微表情背景主效应显著;惊讶和愉快微表情背景主效应不显著,成对比较发现各背景下惊讶/愉快微表情差异不显著,但是与普通表情有广泛的显著差异。用不同背景下微表情识别正确率的标准差定义生态化微表情识别波动,发现生态化微表情识别具有稳定的波动性。
Matsumoto et al.（2000） developed classical JACBART microexpressions recognition test, but it only measured microexpressions recognition between neutral expression backgrounds, which was just a special case of microexpressions in various backgrounds, so its ecological validity was not high. Zhang et al.（2014） only used sadness, neutral and pleasant expressions as backgrounds, and did not establish a standard test. Therefore this study for the first time set up a standard recognition test of ecological microexpressions with seven basic expressions as backgrounds and six basic expressions as microexpressions. Experiment adopted a 7（backgrounds） × 6（microexpressions/expressions） × 2（the first and second tests） within subjects design. We chose sadness, fear, anger, disgust, neutral, surprise, and happiness expressions as backgrounds, and in one trail, ahead and back backgrounds were the same expression, whose time was 800 ms. We chose sadness, fear, anger, disgust, surprise, and happiness as microexpressions between ahead and back backgrounds, whose time was 133 ms. The participants should identify microexpressions as accurately as possible in each trial. For retest reliability, every participant needed to do two same tests, whose interval was 1 week. Before the first test, participants filled the openness inventory of big five personality scale, and before the second test they filled the depression inventory. The results showed that：（1） We used the accuracy of microexpression/expressions recognition in the first experiment as the dependent variable and did a 7（backgrounds） × 6（microexpressions/expressions） analysis of variance. Backgrounds and microexpressions/expressions were within-subject independent variables. Sphericity test of backgrounds showed p〉0.05; the main effect of backgrounds was significant, F（6,59） = 25.89, p〈0.001, η2p = 0.238, which indicated that background expressions affected microexpressions/expressions. Sphericity test of microexpressions/expression
出处
《心理学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2017年第7期886-896,共11页
Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金
国家自然科学基金(31271084)资助
关键词
生态化微表情识别测验
生态化微表情识别的特征
经典微表情
背景表情
生态化微表情识别的波动
ecological microexpressions recognition test
characteristics of ecological microexpressions recognition
classical microexpressions
background expressions
fluctuation of ecological microexpressions recognition
