摘要
作为分析实证法学派的奠基人,约翰·奥斯丁主张将法理学的对象限定在实在法的范围之内,倡导分析性的研究策略,以此构建一门独立的法律科学。根据他的讲义内容整理的《法理学的范围》一书传递了他主要的法律思想。尽管奥斯丁理论的不完备性招致了后人的诸多质疑和批判,但是他在法律研究中的去道德化思路,对法律形式和权威结构中强制要素的侧重以及对功利原则政治作用的推崇,在当下仍然具有理论启发价值。从奥斯丁理论中理解、体会和反思他的问题意识和政治关怀,将对我们检讨当下的法治实践颇有助益。
As the founder of analytical positivism law school, John Austin argued that the object of jurisprudence should be limited to the scope of the real law. He advocated analytical research strategies from which an independent legal science was established. The book titled with ＂The Province of Jurisprudence Determined＂ which is based on his lectures, contained his main legal thoughts. Although the incompleteness of Austin＇s theory has led to many questions and criticisms, his idea of separating law from morality in legal research, his attention on the legal form and structure elements of the compulsory authority and his highly thought of utilitarian principle which playing an important role in politics, still have theoretical elicitation value. Understanding, reflecting and thinking about his problem consciousness and political concern from Austen＇s theory will be useful for us to review the current rule of law practice.
作者
覃李慧
QIN Li -hui(School of Politics and Law, Shanxi Datong University, Shanxi, Datong 037009, Chin)
出处
《甘肃理论学刊》
2017年第4期127-133,共7页
Gansu Theory Research
关键词
约翰·奥斯丁
主权
命令
分析法学
实证主义法学派
John Austin＇s
sovereignty
command
analytical jurisprudence
Positivist school of law
