摘要
法律规定过于宽泛,专家辅助人诉讼地位规定模糊,导致其实践中处遇尴尬,甚至"一席难求",这些都限制着专家辅助人制度作用的发挥。专家辅助人制度的产生,可打破我国刑事诉讼中司法鉴定人一元化的专家格局,促进当事人诉讼权利的有效实现,推进庭审实质化改革的深入进行,完善我国的证据规则体系。因此,应当构建"以司法鉴定制度为主,以专家辅助人制度为补充"的"两元制"专家制度:赋予专家辅助人的诉讼参与人的资格地位,明确其权利义务乃至庭审中的席位,同时将专家辅助人意见纳入法定证据的范畴;专家辅助人出庭应当遵循相应的规则;对其选任和管理,可以借鉴和吸收鉴定人制度的成熟经验,但也应当突出特点。
The fact that regulations are too general and the legal status of expert assistants is vague leads to embarrassed position of expert assistants in practice. All these restrict the function of the expert assistant system. The expert assistant system can break the ＂sole pattern＂ of judicial appraisers in current criminal procedure. It can promote the effective realization of the litigant＇s rights, promote the reform of substantive trial, and perfect the evidence rules in our country. Therefore, it is necessary to construct the ＂dual element＂ expert system which takes the judicial appraisal system as the major one and the expert assistant system as supplementary. It is necessary to give expert assistants the status of the participants in the proceedings. It is also necessary to make clear the rights and obligations of expert assistants and even their seating in trial. At the same time, the opinion of expert assistants should be included as statutory evidence. The expert assistants shall abide by the relevant rules when appearing in court. The selection and management of expert assistants can learn from the mature experience of the appraiser system.
作者
李思远
LI Si-yuan(Criminal Justice School, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088, China)
出处
《中国司法鉴定》
2017年第2期10-17,共8页
Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
关键词
司法鉴定
专家辅助人
诉讼地位
法定证据
专家辅助人选任管理
judicial appraisal
expert assistant
status in litigation, statutory evidence
selection management
