摘要
在后五四时代,文化的区域性与世界性是个敏感而微妙的问题,所见人各不一。时人明知东方和西方并未构成一个完整的世界,却惯以它们来表述世界,提示出特定的时代关怀;而提出反对的质疑者,其实也有具体的针对性。尽管时人可以在缺乏共识的基础上进行相互分享的探讨,后人则不宜忽视当年那些似可不言而喻的歧异认知。而当从仿佛可以不计的"小异"中,探索其间的"大不同"。
In the post-May Fourth era,the regional and universal of culture was a sensitive and subtle issue,of which opinions varied greatly.The people,despite their clear notion that the East/West together didnt constitute an entire world,were accustomed to using the East/West to designate the whole world,suggesting specific concerns that are typical of this time;and those who questioned and objected,had their own target in mind.Although the people at the time conducted shared discussions without consensus or common ground,it is inappropriate for us to ignore their self-evident differences of understandings.On the contrary,it is possible for us to explore the'fundamental differences'that were concealed in those seemingly disregard of the'slight differences.'
出处
《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第4期90-99,共10页
Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
