期刊文献+

单腔、双腔气管插管对胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术通气效果及肺损伤的影响 被引量:27

Effect of single lumen endobronchial tube and double lumen endobronchial tube on ventilation and lung injury in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察单腔、双腔气管插管对胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术通气效果及肺损伤的影响。方法 择期全麻下行胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术患者60例,利用随机数字表法分为单腔气管插管组(D组)和双腔气管插管组(S组),各30例。采集患者气管插管完成即刻(T0)、人工气胸后(单肺通气)30 min(T1)、人工气胸后(单肺通气)90 min(T2)、人工气胸结束后(双肺通气)30 min(T3)、拔管后30 min(T4)的动脉血,监测动脉血气;记录各个时间点的心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2 )、血氧分压(PaO2 )、血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)及气道压(Paw)。采集患者T0、T3、手术结束(T5)支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF),应用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测BALF中TNF-α、IL-6、IL-8的水平。记录两组患者术后3 d肺炎发生率。结果 T0~T4时两组患者HR、MAP、SpO2、PaO2、PaCO2差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);与T0时相比,T1~T3时两组患者HR明显升高(P〈0.05),T1~T3时两组患者PaO2明显升高(P〈0.05),T1~T4时两组患者PaCO2明显升高(P〈0.01),T1~T3时两组患者Paw明显升高(P〈0.01);与S组相比,T1~T2时D组患者Paw明显降低(29.5±3.7比21.3±2.1,P=0.001; 30.7±4.8比20.3±2.3,P=0.001)。T0时两组患者BALF中TNF-α、IL-6、IL-8水平差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);与T0时相比,T3、T5时两组患者BALF中TNF-α、IL-6、IL-8的水平明显升高(P〈0.05);与S组相比,T3、T5时D组患者BALF中TNF-α、IL-6、IL-8的水平明显降低(P〈0.05)。与S组相比、D组术后3 d胸片显示肺炎发生率明显降低[4例(13.3%)比11例(36.7%), P=0.017]。结论 单腔、双腔气管插管在胸腹腔镜食管癌根治术中都可以产生满意的通气效果,但是单腔气管插管对肺损伤影响更小。 Objective To investigate the effect of the single lumen endobronchial tube and the double lumen endobronchial tube on ventilation and lung injury in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy. Methods Sixty patients with esophageal cancer undergoing combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy were divided into single lumen endobronchial tube group (D group, n=30) and double lumen endobronchial tube group (S, n=30) according to the random number table. Blood samples were harvested at the moment of tracheal intubation (T0), after artificial pneumothorax (one lung ventilation) 30 min (T1), after artificial pneumothorax (one lung ventilation) 90 min (T2), artificial pneumothorax over (double lung ventilation) 30 min (T3) and after extubation 30 min (T4) for arterial blood gas analysis. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), oxygen tension (PaO2), carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) and airway pressure (PAW) were recorded at T0-T4. The incidences of pneumonia of two groups were record at 3 days after operation.Results There were no obvious differences in HR, MAP, SpO2, PaO2, PaCO2 between two groups at T0-T4 (P〉0.05). Compared with T0, the levels of HR and PaO2 were increased remarkably at T1-T3 (P〈0.05), the levels of PaCO2 were increased remarkably at T1-T4 (P〈0.01), and the levels of Paw were increased remarkably at T1-T3 (P〈0.01). Compared with S group, the levels of Paw were decreased remarkably at T1-T2 (29.5±3.7 vs 21.3±2.1, P=0.001; 30.7±4.8 vs 20.3±2.3, P=0.001). There were no obvious differences in the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF) between two groups at T0 (P〉0.05). Compared with T0, the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 in BALF were increased remarkably at T3, T5 (P〈0.05). Compared with S group, the levels of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-8 in D group in BALF were decreas
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2017年第28期2194-2197,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
基金 河南省高等学校重点科研项目(15A3200076)
关键词 食管肿瘤 胸腹腔镜 炎症因子 Esophageal cancer Combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy Inflammatory factors Lung
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献34

  • 1梁伟民,俞洁璐,张洁.不同方法判断双腔支气管插管位置的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(3):183-184. 被引量:25
  • 2曲家骐,侯维平,高昕,滕洪,史宁江,李铸,于修义.电视胸腔镜食管癌切除术八例初步报告[J].中华外科杂志,1996,34(2):84-86. 被引量:57
  • 3Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin, 2005,55:74-108. 被引量:1
  • 4Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, et al. Comparison of the out- comes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann Surg, 2007,245:232-240. 被引量:1
  • 5McCulloch P, Ward J, Tekkis PP. Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery : initial results of ASCOT multi- centre prospective cohort study. BMJ, 2003,327:1192-1197. 被引量:1
  • 6Avendano CE, Flume PA, Silvestri GA, et al. Pulmonary com-plications after esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg, 2002,73:922-926. 被引量:1
  • 7Law S, Wang KH, Kwok KF, et al. Predictive factors for postop- erative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagecto- my for cancer. Ann Surg, 2004,240:791-800. 被引量:1
  • 8Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, et al. Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial). BMC Surg, 2011,11:2. 被引量:1
  • 9Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009,87:911-919. 被引量:1
  • 10Verhage R J, Hazebroek E J, Boone J, et al. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for canc- er: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chir, 2009,64: 135-146. 被引量:1

共引文献65

同被引文献260

引证文献27

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部