摘要
目的分析不同方法治疗慢性根尖炎的效果。方法分析本院接收的107例慢性根尖炎患者资料,依据临床医治方案分为2组,对照组(50例)行多次根管医治,实验组(57例)行一次性根管医治,对比2组医治前后VAS评分变化及远期疗效。结果实验组牙周袋探诊(PD)(6.75±1.32)mm,出血指数(BI)(2.98±0.63)分,牙菌斑指数(PLI)(1.66±0.72)分;对照组分别为(4.72±1.14)mm、(2.10±0.51)分、(0.95±0.43)分;与对照组相比,实验组PD、BI、PLI水平均显著更优,比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CAP患者行一次性根管与多次根管医治均可取得一定效果,但前者远期疗效更佳,更具临床应用价值。
Objective To Analyze the different methods of treatment of chronic apical inflammation effect. Methods The data of 107 patients with chronic apicalitis received from our hospital were divided into two groups according to the clinical treatment program. The control group（50 cases） underwent multiple root canal therapy. The experimental group（57 cases） underwent one-time root canal treatment.The long-term efficacy and VAS score before and after treatment in two groups. Results Experimental group of periodontal bags（PD）（6.75 ± 1.32） mm, bleeding index（BI）（2.98 ± 0.63）, plaque index（PLI）（1.66 ± 0.72）, the control group were（4.72 ± 1.14） mm,（2.10 ± 0.51） and（0.95 ± 0.43）, respectively. Compared with the control group, the levels of PD, BI and PLI were significantly better in the experimental group, and the differences were statistically significant（P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion CAP patients with one-time root canal and multiple root canal treatment can achieve a certain effect, but the former long-term efficacy is better, more clinical value.
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2017年第14期45-47,共3页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
不同方法
慢性根尖炎
效果
different methods
chronic apical inflammation
effect
